The
Global Polio Eradication Program, supported by the United
Nation's World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, Rotary
International, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
(CDC), is planning to immunize 74 million African children
in 22 countries in the coming months. The purpose is to stem
a wild polio epidemic, the epicenter of which is oil-rich
Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa.
The vaccine program hit a snag last Fall when
Islamic clerics in the predominantly Muslim-populated areas
of northern Nigeria claimed the WHO program was a plot by
westerners to depopulate the area. Laboratory tests revealed
estrogen and other female sex hormones in the polio vaccine,
proof that the vaccines were contaminated with substances
that could cause sterility. Furthermore, Nigerian officials
became aware of internet reports suggesting the WHO vaccine
might be contaminated with HIV (the AIDS virus) and other
cancer-causing viruses. African blacks are as suspicious of
government vaccines programs as American blacks. A 1990
survey of African-Americans in New York City showed 30%
believed AIDS is an ethno-specific bioweapon designed in a
laboratory to kill black people.
Dr. David Heymann, who heads the WHO
eradication program, says the oral polio vaccine (which
contains live but attenuated polio virus) is completely
safe. He blames Nigerians for exporting polio to surrounding
nations.
The WHO, the world's leading international
health and science agency, is mired in power politics. For
example, the Bush administration now restricts
communications between the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) and WHO officials. A new HHS policy requires
the WHO to submit all requests for expert scientific advice
to political officials at HHS who will then choose which
federal scientists will be permitted to respond. The new
policy and two recent Administration decisions to withdraw
federal scientists from major international health
conferences are part of a disturbing pattern of political
interference in global health issues.
Antifertility
Vaccines and the WHO
In
March 2004, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and
Dean of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, Nigeria, took
samples of the controversial WHO's oral polio vaccine to
India for analysis. Evidence of serious vaccine
contamination was found. According to a March 11, 2004
report on
www.lifesite.net, Kaita was asked why drug manufacturers
would contaminate the oral polio vaccine. He gave three
reasons: "These manufacturers or promoters of these harmful
things have a secret agenda which only further research can
reveal. Secondly they have always taken us in the third
world for granted, thinking we don't have the capacity,
knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal
such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have
people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and
worst still some of these are supposed to be our own
professionals who we rely on to protect our interests." Dr.
Kaita is demanding that "those who imported this fake drug
in the name of Polio Vaccines- be prosecuted like any other
criminal."
This is not the first time the WHO has
been called on the carpet to explain their surreptitious use
of antifertility vaccines. Millions of female Mexicans,
Nicaraguans and Filipinos were duped into taking tetanus
vaccines, some of which were laced with a female hormone
that could cause miscarriage and sterilization. In 1995 a
Catholic organization called Human Life International
accused the WHO of promoting this Canadian-made tetanus
vaccine covertly laced with a pregnancy hormone called human
choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG). Suspicions were aroused
when the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in the peculiar dose
of five multiple injections over a three month period, and
recommended only to women of child-bearing age. When an
unusual number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and
miscarriages after the shots, a hormone additive was
uncovered as the cause.
It is no secret that since the 1970's the
WHO has been testing and funding antifertility vaccine
research that would make a woman's immune system attack and
destroy her own babies in the womb. In Geneva in 1989 the
WHO sponsored a Symposium on Antifertility Vaccines and
Contraceptive Vaccines.
Third-world women who received the laced
tetanus shots not only developed antibodies to tetanus, but
developed dangerous antibodies to the pregnancy HCG hormone
as well. Without HCG, growth of the fetus is impaired.
Consequently, the WHO's vaccine served as a covert and
unsuspected contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyze
the vaccine, the Philippines Medical Association found that
20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines were contaminated
with the hormone. The WHO has denied all accusations as
"completely false and without basis," and the U.S. media
never reported on the controversy. For further details, go
to www.google.com and
type-in "WHO + antifertility vaccine", or "Philippines +
antifertility vaccine."
Following an eight month boycott, on June
24, 2004, the recalcitrant Nigerians agreed to resume polio
vaccinations, under the conditions the polio vaccine had to
be manufactured in Indonesia and nowhere else.
The WHO and the
Man-Made Theory of AIDS
Unlike
most Americans, Africans are aware of the man-made theory of
AIDS, and the possibility that the WHO's extensive vaccine
programs in Africa in the 1970s are connected to the severe
outbreak of AIDS in the early 1980s.
On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of
the world's most respected newspapers, published an
explosive article entitled, "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS
virus." The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine
program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing
AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in
central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was
held responsible for awakening a "dormant" AIDS virus
infection on the continent.
An advisor to the WHO admitted, "Now I
believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for
the explosion of AIDS." Robert Gallo, M,D., the
co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, "The link between the
WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important
hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I
have been saying for some years that the use of live
vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a
dormant infection such as HIV." Despite the tremendous
importance of this story, the U.S. media was totally silent
on the report, and Gallo never spoke of it again.
In September 1987, at a conference
sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia,
California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., bluntly blamed
the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a
widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled "W.H.O.
Murdered Africa" , he accused the organization of
encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work
with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an
immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to
humans. From the Bulletin of the World Health Organization
(Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a passage that stated:
"An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact
exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility
should be looked into that the immune response to the virus
itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more
or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus."
According to Douglass, "That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying
in plain English is Let's cook up a virus that selectively
destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune
deficiency.'" The entire article can be read on google.com
("WHO Murdered Africa").
In his 1989 book, AIDS: The End of
Civilization, Douglass claims the WHO laced the African
vaccines. He blames "the virologists of the world, the
sorcerers who brought us this ghastly plague, and have
formed a united front in denying that the virus was
laboratory-made from known, lethal animal viruses. The
scientific party line is that a monkey in Africa with AIDS
bit a native on the butt. The native then went to town and
gave it to a prostitute who gave it to a local banker who
gave it to his wife and three girl friends, and wham - 75
million people became infected with AIDS in Africa. An
entirely preposterous story."
Indeed, in my two books on man-made AIDS -
AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin
of the Epidemic (1988) , and in Queer Blood: The
Secret AIDS Genocide Plot (1993), there is much evidence
to show that throughout the 1970s (the decade that preceded
the AIDS outbreak in the U.S. and Africa) there was
widespread laboratory transfer of animal viruses,
particularly primate/simian/monkey/chimpanzee viruses, by
virologists. Various animal viruses were pumped into
different species of animals and into all sorts of cell
cultures. This experimentation was undertaken to find,
create, and develop new cancer-causing and immunosuppressive
viruses. It is these species-jumping laboratory primate
viruses that are the source of "human" immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) - not the animals in the wild in Africa.
To researchers who believe whole-heartedly
that AIDS is a man-made disease, the evidence is crystal
clear that the "primate ancestor virus of HIV" jumped
species via contaminated vaccine programs, namely the
extensive WHO-sponsored vaccine programs in sub-Saharan
Africa during the 1970's, and the experimental hepatitis B
vaccine (1978-1981) that was injected exclusively into gay
men just prior to the outbreak of AIDS in America. (More on
this later.)
Cancer-causing
Monkey Viruses and the Polio Vaccine
Americans have been told repeatedly that
HIV/AIDS is the first time a monkey virus has jumped species
to cause a new epidemic called AIDS. But the
rarely-publicized truth is that a cancer-causing monkey
viruses jumped species a half century ago when contaminated
polio vaccines were given to millions of people on the
planet, including half the U.S. population of that era.
In
the early 1960's it was discovered that some lots of polio
vaccines manufactured on rhesus monkey kidney tissue during
the period 1955 to 1963 were contaminated with a monkey
virus called SV40 (Simian[monkey] virus #40). This primate
virus was quickly proven to cause various cancers in
experimental animals. However, to this day, U.S. government
officials still insist there is no absolute proof that SV40
causes human cancer.
Despite the lack of government interest in
SV40 in human cancer for three decades, genetic and
immunologic studies by independent researchers over the past
decade indicate this virus is clearly associated with human
cancer, such as rapidly-fatal cancers of the lung (mesothelioma),
bone marrow cancer (multiple myeloma), brain tumors in
children, and other forms of cancer.
A Washington Times report (09/21/03)
indicates "Some of the polio vaccine given to millions of
American children from 1962 until 2000 could have been
contaminated with a monkey virus that shows up in some
cancers, according to documents and testimony to be
delivered to a House committee Wednesday. The vaccine
manufacturer said such claims don't have any validity,' and
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) agrees.
Documents set to be delivered to the House Subcommittee on
Human Rights and Wellness appear to show that the original
"seeds" used to produce the Sabin [oral] vaccine could have
been tainted with SV40; that the company that manufactured
the vaccine, Wyeth Lederle, may have used Rhesus monkeys --
which are more likely to carry the disease -- rather than
the African Green monkeys it says it used, according to
company documents; and that the company may not have
performed all of the screening tests required."
Stanley P Kops is a lawyer who represents
children and adults damaged by polio vaccines. He has
documentation indicating that the polio virus "seeds" from
which the oral vaccine is made are still not proven to be
free of SV40. In his article entitled "Oral polio vaccine
and human cancer: a reassessment of SV40 as a contaminant
based upon legal documents", appearing in the journal
Anticancer Research (November 2000), Kops states: "In
litigation involving the Lederle oral polio vaccine, the
manufacturer's internal documents failed to reveal such
removal [of SV40] in all of the seeds. The absence of
confirmatory testing of the seeds, as well as testimony of a
Lederle manager, indicate that this claim of removal of SV40
and the testing for SV40 in all the seeds cannot be fully
substantiated. These legal documents and testimony indicate
that the scientific community should not be content with
prior assumptions that SV40 could not have been in the oral
polio vaccine. Only further investigation by outside
scientific and independent researchers who can review the
test results claimed in the January 1997 meeting and who can
conduct their own independent evaluations by testing all the
seeds and individual mono-valent pools will assure that SV40
has not been present in commercially sold oral poliovirus
vaccine manufactured by Lederle."
More information on Kops, SV40, and polio
litigation can be found at
www.sv40cancer.com
More than 600 million doses of polio
vaccine were sold by Lederle from 1963 to 1999. On Jan. 1,
2000, the CDC recommended injections of an inactivated
killed polio vaccine (IPV) that eliminates the risk of
spreading the disease, unlike the oral live polio vaccine
that had been used for decades. This prompted Lederle to get
out of the polio vaccine business, and the last batch of
Orimune was produced on Dec. 31, 1999.
For anyone who still thinks that vaccine
makers and government health officials are always your
friend, I would highly recommend a just-published book
titled AIDS. The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of
a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine,
and the Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie
Bookchin and Jim Schumacher. The book explores the history
of the polio vaccine, the contamination problems with SV40 ,
the ensuing vaccine-related cancer problems, and the
government's cover-up of the problem over the past three
decades.
Few people realize how dangerous vaccines
can be and how complicated the process of vaccine
manufacture really is, particularly when vaccines are made
on living animal or human cells. Contamination with bacteria
and viruses and their elimination from the final product are
constant problems during the process. There are also recent
suspicions that the laboratory media used to feed and
nourish the cell cultures upon which the virus is grown may
also be a source of contamination. For further details on
the dangers of vaccines, see "Are Vaccines Causing More
Diseases than they are Curing?" (www.whale.to/v/cantwell.html)
The Polio Vaccine/ Primate Virus
Connection to African AIDS
In a 1,070 page book published in 1999,
entitled The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and
AIDS, Edward Hooper claims a 1950's polio vaccine made
using monkey (and possibly chimp) kidneys, contained the
ancestor virus of HIV which now infects millions of
Africans. Hooper's research greatly expands the polio
vaccine man-made theory of AIDS first reported by Tom Curtis
in Rolling Stone magazine in 1992. When Curtis asked the
ubiquitous David Heymann whether the 1950's polio vaccine
might have contributed to the outbreak, the WHO official
declared: "The origin of the AIDS virus is of no importance
to science today. Any speculation on how it arose is of no
importance." Quite an amazing response from a man currently
responsible for administering a possibly contaminated live
oral polio vaccine to Africa's children.
Hooper's book got extensive press
coverage, greatly upsetting the AIDS establishment which has
always viewed any suggestion of AIDS as a man-made disease
as hysteria, paranoia or "conspiracy theory." Similarly, my
two decades of man-made AIDS research linking AIDS to 1970's
vaccine, as well as two books on the subject, were dismissed
by Hooper in a sentence in a footnote on page 897.
Not surprisingly, Hooper's vaccine theory
was totally discredited the following year by AIDS
scientists and WHO officials at a Conference held in London
to debate the origin of AIDS, although Hooper still actively
promotes his theory on the internet. The retesting of the
old 1950's polio vaccine showed no evidence of a chimp
virus. The molecular biologists also came down hard on
Hopper with their "genetic sequencing data" suggesting HIV
first entered the human population in the 1930's. (For
details, google "2000 London Origin of AIDS.")
Why it took HIV a half-century to produce
an epidemic was not made clear, nor was there any discussion
as to how a black heterosexual African disease could have
transformed itself exclusively into a white gay man's
disease in Manhattan. Or why the epidemic broke out first in
America in 1979 and was only uncovered five years later in
Africa.
Oral Polio
Vaccine and Immunodeficiency
The public frequently receives bad news
about AIDS in Africa. Millions are dying, millions are
infected with HIV, and millions of children are left as
orphans. And this is just the AIDS part of the various
horrors connected with Africa.
Africans question why they are being given
the oral form of the polio vaccine (OPV) when this form was
removed from the market in America in January 2000. The
inactivated and killed polio virus vaccine (IPV) cannot
cause polio, but the live OPV is indeed capable of causing
(although rarely) paralytic polio. Equally dangerous is that
OPV recipients shed live polio virus, which is entirely
capable of spreading polio to unvaccinated and unprotected
others. However, the oral form of the vaccine is the only
form recommended by health officials for outbreaks of polio
epidemics.
Even if the IPV vaccine were effective,
the cost would be prohibitive. A 5cc. vial (enough to
adequately inoculate 3 children with three separate
injections) is $US 300. Is this form of the vaccine totally
safe? The expensive IPV is thought to contain
newly-discovered nanobacteria, which have been linked to
various diseases. The Vaccine web site
www.whale.to claims
nanobacteria have been found to be a contaminant in
previously assumed-to-be-sterile medical products,
specifically the IPV Polio Vaccine. Most human biologicals
and vaccines are made in fetal bovine (cow) serum, a medium
known to be contaminated with nanobacteria, as reported May
23rd, 2001, at the 101st General Meeting of the American
Society for Microbiology.
Bad vaccine reactions are increased in the
presence of HIV, immunodeficiency and malnutrition, which is
purportedly common in sub-Saharan Africans. So why is this
not being considered? Will the WHO's live oral vaccine
awaken more "dormant" HIV? Nowhere could I find this
question being asked by WHO officials or other scientists.
The WHO vaccine for Africa (except parts of Nigeria) is made
by Aventis Pasteur, a multinational pharmaceutical company
headquartered in France. In 2003 Aventis donated 30 million
doses to the program.
The Origin of
AIDS and Monkey Business
A google search of the "origin of AIDS"
lists an overwhelming 796,000 citations.
However, there are essentially three major
theories of AIDS origin. The AIDS establishment believes
unanimously in the "official" monkey out-of-Africa theory.
Second is Hooper's polio vaccine origin, now largely
discredited or ignored. And third is the never-discussed
"conspiracy theory" that HIV was deliberately seeded into
gay and black African populations as a covert depopulation
experiment with genocidal overtones.
Until 1999, it was widely believed that
the African Green Monkey was the source of HIV. This theory
was highly touted by Robert Gallo, the world's most famous
AIDS researcher, who had done extensive animal virus
research forcing ("jumping") primate viruses between species
in the Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1980) in the years
just before the AIDS outbreak. In 1975 Gallo reported on a
"new" and "human" HL23 virus, which eventually proved to be
three contaminating ape viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian
sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he
has no idea how these viruses contaminated his laboratory [Queer
Blood, p47]. For more information on pre-AIDS primate
virus research, google "primate research + Special Virus
Cancer Program."
In 1999 there was renewed interest in the
origin of AIDS. A media blitz surrounded the finding of a
team of researchers headed by Beatrice Hahn, M,D,, at the
University of Alabama. Viral studies on three African chimps
in the wild, and on the corpse of a frozen chimp named
Marilyn, found accidentally in a freezer at Fort Detrick
(the Army's biowarfare unit), all indicated a common
subspecies of chimp was the animal source "most closely"
related to HIV. Hahn theorized the epidemic started when a
hunter cut himself which butchering chimp meat and
subsequently became infected. For details, google "Beatrice
Hahn + Marilyn".
Hahn is no stranger to primate theories,
having worked in Gallo's lab when he was heavily promoting
the green monkey theory in the mid-1980's. Her publicized
1999 AIDS origin research, based on genetic and molecular
evidence, was quickly accepted as gospel by the AIDS
establishment.
In 2003 she presented further details of
her primate research, which was again touted in the media.
This time her findings were even more impenetrable (at least
to me). The most popular origin of AIDS web site (www.avert.org/origins.htm)
summarizes Hahn's most recent findings in this way: "The
findings of this 10-year long research into the origin and
evolution of HIV by Paul Sharp of Nottingham University and
Beatrice Hahn of the University of Alabama were published in
2003. They concluded that wild chimps became infected
simultaneously with two simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs)
which had viral sex' to form a third virus capable of
infecting humans and causing AIDS. Professor Sharp and his
colleagues discovered that the chimp virus was an amalgam of
the SIV infecting red-capped mangabeys and the virus found
in greater spot-nosed monkeys. They believe that the
hybridization took place inside chimps that had become
infected with both strains of SIV after hunting and killing
the two smaller species of monkey."
American AIDS
and the Gay Hepatitis B Experiments (1978-1981)
Due to space requirements it is not
possible to give all the evidence pointing to AIDS as a
man-made disease. However, a Google search of "man-made
AIDS" lists 135,000 citations (not bad for a "conspiracy
theory"!) and most of my published research on the subject
can be found on the internet ("alan cantwell + man-made
AIDS").
It is my view that the origin of AIDS
cannot be determined without some reasonable (and not
homophobic) explanation of how AIDS originated in America
exclusively in young, predominantly white, previously
healthy gay men in Manhattan, beginning in 1979. To my
knowledge, there is no evidence to show that American AIDS
originated in Africa. Furthermore, the virus "strain" of HIV
in the U.S. is totally different from African strains. This
finding has led AIDS researcher Max Essex of Harvard (and
co-discoverer of HIV) to suggest that there may be two
separate HIV-1 epidemics - one in which subtype B [the
American strain] predominates and that is spread by blood
and homosexual sex, and a second involving the other HIV-1
subtypes and primarily vaginal sex [as seen in Africa]. (www.aegis.com/news/ads/1995/AD951870.html).
The onset of the "gay plague" and "gay
cancer" (in the form of Kaposi's sarcoma) are clearly
associated with the hepatitis B vaccine trials which used
young gay men as guinea pigs during the years 1978-1981. A
few months after the first group of men were injected in the
experiment in Manhattan at the New York Blood Center, the
first cases of "gay-related immune deficiency" were reported
to the CDC. The experimental hepatitis B vaccine was
developed in chimpanzees, the animal species now thought to
harbor "the ancestor of HIV."
Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp
out-of-Africa theory is the fact that the New York Blood
Center established a chimp virus laboratory in West Africa
in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian
Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia,
was to develop the human hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. The
lab prides itself by releasing "rehabilitated" chimps back
into the wild.
Also closely allied to the "pre-AIDS"
development of the hepatitis B vaccine is the little
publicized primate colony outside New York City called
LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and
Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York
area scientists with primates and primate parts for
transplantation and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP
was affiliated with the NYU Medical Center, where the first
cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered in
1979.
HIV tests of the stored gay men's blood
from the hepatitis experiment at the New York Blood Center
reveals that 6% of the men were HIV-positive in 1979!
By 1981, the year the AIDS epidemic became
"official", 20% of the men were positive! By 1984, 40% were
positive! This means that this group had a spectacularly
higher rate of HIV than any group in Africa during the same
period - and at a time when AIDS cases were not even
recognized or noted in Africa.
It is clear that there is overwhelming
molecular and genetic evidence to tie SV40 related cancer
cases to the SV40 contamination of polio vaccines. Yet
government health officials refuse to accept this research
on the grounds of "not enough evidence" and "contamination
problems" connected with SV40 testing (See Bookchin and
Schumaker's book). On the other hand, AIDS experts try to
convince us that a molecular HIV test on a dried-up blood
specimen taken from an unknown black man in the Congo in
1959 is strong "proof" that human HIV cases existed in
Africa back in 1959!! To me, the explanation for this
absurdity and inconsistency in science is simple: The
government does NOT want people to question the safety of
vaccines, and it wants to blame Africans and African monkeys
for a disease that is most likely caused by covert primate
virus contaminated vaccine experiments, that undoubtedly
still continue to this day. For more documentation of covert
and unethical government-sponsored human experimentation ,
read In the Name of Science: A History of Secret
Programs, Medical Research, and Human Experimentation
[2003] by Andrew Goliszek.
AIDS scientists accept the fact that HIV
was "introduced" into gays, but do not publicize the fact
that a second virus - the Kaposi's sarcoma virus, also known
as human herpes virus-8- was also introduced into gays at
the time of the gay vaccine experiments. Are two new viruses
just another "accident of Mother Nature"?
Two decades after the KS virus was
"introduced" into gay men, it is now a permanent virus in
the blood supply, which is beginning (like SV40) to appear
in association with certain cancers. Twenty percent of
"healthy" Texas blood donors now carry antigens to the KS
virus in their blood. As many as 40% of Caribbean men with
prostate cancer also carry the virus.
More details on the KS virus and the role
of bacteria in KS cancer and other cancers can be found in
"Acid-fast Bacteria Discovered in Prostate Cancer" (www.rense.com/general53/acsaid.htm);
and in my book The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden Killer in
Cancer, AIDS, and other Immune Diseases.
It is clear to me that AIDS science is
highly selective. Scientists who support the African origin
of AIDS are heralded. Scientists and researchers who support
the man-made, laboratory origin of AIDS are ignored as
"conspiracy theorists" or crackpots.
The Revenge of
the Monkeys
AIDS scientists blame AIDS on promiscuity,
homosexuality, dirty needles, drugs, air travel, etc,, but
never once do they seriously consider themselves responsible
in any way for the AIDS holocaust. Scientists quickly
obscured the primate virus origin of AIDS by calling it the
"human" immunodeficiency virus, a clever attempt to
accentuate the "human" quality rather than calling it by its
real name -a simian (primate) immunodeficiency virus. Better
to advise people to not transmit a human virus, than to
remind them they are spreading an animal virus of dubious
origin.
On the altar of science the primate
populations of Africa are dwindling to extinction. And the
ultimate blame for AIDS is placed on primates who cannot
speak for themselves. Over the decades millions of animals
have been sacrificed for their kidneys and other organs to
make vaccines which are now creating new plagues of
incurable AIDS and cancer and new emerging diseases which in
turn demand more animal sacrifice to make more vaccines and
drugs..
Monkeys, chimps, apes, gorillas, and human
beings are all classified as "primates." "Human primates"
and "non-human primates" share 99% of the same DNA. Yet, we
treat them all as disposable beings, locking them up in
increasingly large numbers as slaves of science in animal
gulags called "primate centers" for the sole purpose of
using them and their children as hapless research tools.
As a physician, I am not against animal
experimentation. However, I am against foolish and excessive
and dangerous animal experiments that expose millions,
perhaps billions of people, to disease and death from
contaminated vaccines and insane biological warfare
creations. I do not believe we can exterminate countless
animals for our selfish purposes without some sort of
reckoning. What goes around, comes around.
Will the monkeys and the chimps get their
revenge?. It's obvious it is already happening. AIDS is
depopulating the planet. Mad cow disease is a concern. SARS
is yet another deadly emerging disease. The list goes on and
on.
There is no indication things will get
better. Only worse. Isn't it time we get over our fantasy
that slaughtering these animals will somehow help us attain
better health?.
Deadly HIV and SV40 virus from primates
have already co-mingled with our human genetic material,
changing our collective gene pool forever.
How many more people will have to die as a
result of our lab atrocities and our scientific ignorance?
The more animals we kill for science, the more people will
die from "emerging" laboratory viruses. Admittedly this is a
hard concept to understand and accept when we have been
conditioned to believe that abusing and killing animals for
science is in our best interest.
[Dr. Cantwell is the author of two books
on the man-made epidemic of AIDS: AIDS and the Doctors of
Death, and Queer Blood, available from Book
Clearing House @ 1-800-431-1579 ad
www.bookch.com] |