Q: Is the GB-4000 the same as the Ultimate B3?
A: The GB-4000 is the latest model of this frequency generator. It's predecessor, the Ultimate B3 was discontinued after the new model was released. There was an even earlier model which preceded the Ultimate B3 which was called the RifeUltimate.

Q: What is the output of the GB-4000 Frequency Generator?
A: RF Mode: 1.9 Watts, 85 Volts Under Load (current in milliamps); Audio Mode: 30 - 35 Volts 1/5th of a Watt. The output of the GB-A4 Amplifier is approximately 10 watts in RF mode.

Q: Can Hulda Clark zappers be used as a Beck device?
A: No they can't. Clark Zappers run at much too high of a frequency (30kHz) to Beck's 4Hz. The Zapper output current is only 1.2mA whereas the Beck blood electrifier is 12mA. Also, the Zapper uses pulsed DC positive offset output while the Beck devices are Bi-Phasic AC.

Q: What is the difference between the output of a contact or "pad" type instrument and the output of the RAY TUBE?
A: Contact or "pad" type instruments deliver frequencies through direct contact, while Ray Tube Instruments transmit frequencies indirectly through the air. Direct contact is a substantially more powerful and accurate than indirect contact. The ray tube is terribly inefficient, and being an indirect contact device, requires much more power at the higher frequencies to deliver it's output. In other words, it requires more power to drive these higher frequencies (in the megahertz range) to be effective. Direct contact instruments such as the GB-4000 do not have this problem.

Q: I've read a lot on the internet about various manufacturers claiming that an "Analog" instrument is superior to what they call "digital" instruments. Is this true?
A: This is a common ploy by some unethical manufacturers to fool potential buyers into purchasing their instruments based on erroneous information. The reason for this is typically they do not have the research and development funds necessary to design, develop, and manufacture solid-state electronic (IC) circuit technology. They also say things like   "There are thousands of frequencies between each positioned frequency on a digital machine that are missed when going from one frequency to the other. This means that when you set the dial to a specific frequency like 600 then move up the scale between 600 (600.0000) and 901 (900.9999) there are thousands of combinations of frequencies (resonant and harmonic) surrounding the target frequencies that are covered when using an analog machine and are missed with a digital machine".   This kind of dis-information is complete nonsense given the fact that the latest generation of solid-state machines such as the GB-4000 have both "Sweep" and "Channel Sweep" functions which are capable of reaching an infinite amount of frequency and harmonic combinations between the primary chosen frequencies. The output frequencies of the GB-4000 are an ANALOG signal which has been converted from a DIGITAL signal using a DAC or Digital-to-Analog Converter. This method is far superior and exponentially more powerful and accurate the older manual tuning methods. Try tuning 18,700,000.25 Hz with a so-called "analog" instrument. Notice that your television, appliances, stereo system, car radio, cell phone, computer, watches, and calculators all use digital tuning. The reason for this is obvious. The digital circuitry is more accurate, reliable, and technologically superior than its antiquated counterpart (remember the clunky old manual TV tuning knobs that wouldn't work after a short time?). For a more in-depth explanation of this issue, click HERE.

Q: Can I use my computer soundcard and frequency generator software as a Rife Machine?
A: Yes, you can, but there would be no RF carrier, no frequencies past 20,000 Hz and certainly insufficient current and power to have any noticeable effect.

Q: What different frequency delivery methods are there and what are the limitations of each?
A: There are many types of instruments currently available using different methods to deliver the output frequencies. They are:

• MAGNETIC DELIVERY – This kind of machine has a coil or chamber and uses pulsed magnetism. Magnetic delivery is the same as broadcast delivery in that it lacks the electro-stimulus effect, which can only be accomplished by direct application.
• BROADCAST DELIVERY – The external tube treatments used with today's ray tube equipment are either set up in a room for a radiation effect, or they are of a small design that is slowly passed over the targeted area of the subject. The design of the tube and the gas contained in it determine the type of effect that the machine can achieve.
  
  We believe that the atmosphere contains many conflicting and competing frequencies, and this multitude of frequencies will interfere with any broadcast of a specific frequency that a ray tube machine broadcasts, regardless of the power range of the equipment. If one cannot control the medium through which the frequency travels, how can one know that the frequency that they are broadcasting is actually the frequency that is contacting the subject, and that it has the power to carry through to the targeted area? Plasma tube instruments have an exponential loss of power depending on how far you are from the phanotron tube. For the tube to be effective, it must be driven with extremely high power and have a directional reflector in the center of the tube. We believe there are too many outside variables that can interfere with the intended frequency using plasma tube systems. Even the design of the ray tube itself is a variable. We have found (as Dr. Rife did) that the direct contact method of frequency delivery seems to be the easiest and most controllable way for a anyone to achieve positive, reproducible results.
• DIRECT APPLICATION DELIVERY – After years of experimenting and engineering, we have concluded that this method is the superior way to transmit frequencies through a target without any external interference. The transmitted frequencies can be introduced directly by cylinders or pads placed on the subject, or by placing the feet in tubs of water. Clearly, an instrument that is capable of direct contact operation, utilizes an RF carrier frequency with harmonics, has a wide frequency range, and has enough power to penetrate tissue is the most effective.

Q: Is the government, scientific, or medical community doing any testing with this technology?
A: Here are some links to news stories that show progress is being made in this field.

• USDA Oscillating Magnetic Fields for Microbial Inactivation
• Powerful Electrical Shocks Might Zap Tumors
• Knifeless Surgery Kills Cancer With Sound
• Pulsed Magnetic Fields May Increase Intelligence
• Amazing Discovery: white cells (leucocytes) kill bacteria and pathogenic fungi by electrocuting them! (Reported in French "Science & Vie" Magazine)
• Dolphins Use "Sonic Booms" to Kill Prey
• Electrical Current Heals Chronic Wounds
• A New Germ Theory
• Science Rediscovering Electric & Magnetic Fields for Health & Healing
• Therapeutic Magnetism Yesterday and Today
• Radio Wave Remote Control For Bacteria
• FDA: Pulsed Electric Fields for Microbial Inactivation
• USDA: Ultrasound In Food Processing
• USDA: Microwave and Radio Frequency (RF) Processing
• Ultrasound Cancer Treatment Kills Tumors in Mice
• Radio Frequencies (Here's Our RF Again Killing "Pests"!) Used To Kill Agriculture Pests
• Rife Breakthrough - Hepatitis Zapped!

Q: Do you have any testimonials?
A: We do not publish testimonials due to recent F.T.C. regulation changes.

Q: What information is available in the "Members Only" area?
A: Throughout the years we have collected numerous papers, e-books, files, and other interesting research materials, much of which is no longer publicly available. Access to this area is provided upon request with the purchase on any instrument.