Cancell
by Paul Winter

Alternative cancer treatment Cancell is being suppressed. Cancell web site contains proof of this suppression. Cancell is a safe alternative cancer treatment which has successfully treated people and animals for a wide array of diseases for more than thirty years without dangerous side affects. This web site also contains protocols and ordering information for Cancell and other alternative cancer treatments such as Laetrile and Hydrazine Sulfate.

Summary

The Cancell Home page exposes the fraud behind pharmaceutical company controlled medical research institutions. These institutions are responsible for preventing numerous safe alternative cancer treatments from getting to the public.

Your Doctor’s Information

Even if you have the best doctors, their information about any alternative cancer treatment is probably incorrect. Doctors are so busy that they must rely on summaries of medical research. This web site contains proof that summaries from main stream medical institutions have distorted test results beyond any resemblance to the truth. These cases fit a pattern which is thoroughly explained in the book, The Cancer Industry by Ralph Moss (click to order this book from Amazon.com). One doctors views on medical research in America.

NCI Publishes Summaries

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the most active organization screening conventional and alternative cancer treatments. NCI has a $2.2 billion annual budget (yes billion) mostly supplied by our taxes. After testing Cancell, NCI published the following false test summary which is easily found on the web: "Cancell did not demonstrate a biological effect considered worthy of further study." The actual test results show that this statement is an outrageous lie. You can use this site to view the NCI test data sheets or order the test results from NCI directly and see that Cancell has more biological effect than the "gold standard" of chemo, Taxol.

A Long History of Disinformation

Researchers told the same lies about Laetrile that were told about Cancell and it took ten years before anybody looked beyond the summary of Laetrile testing and examined the test data. By then it was too late; most people and doctors thought Laetrile was a hoax. It’s not a hoax, but not taking Laetrile without vitamin-A in a micro-emulsification and enzymes such as Pancreatin ( found in Wobenzym) produces poor results. To learn the numerous ways Laetrile was discredited, read The Cancer Industry by Ralph Moss. To see impressive evidence of the trophoblast theory behind Laetrile as a cancer treatment and simple preventative, read the book World Without Cancer by Griffin. If you don't have time, at least order the video of World Without Cancer.

In a Nut Shell

Professor George Mathe, French cancer specialist, "Scientific Medicine Stymied," Medicines Nouvelles (Paris), said in March 1989, "If I contracted cancer, I would never go to a standard cancer treatment center. Cancer victims who live far from such centers have a chance."

Mainstream doctors receive distorted information on alternative cancer treatments. Therefore, you cannot rely on mainstream doctors to recommend the correct cancer treatment. You must rely on yourself. If you can read the above two books, you will most likely avoid:

Being operated on to determine if your tumors are cancerous. The operation has a good chance of spreading cancer cells and is completely unnecessary because there is a urine test that is as reliable as a biopsy (source: World Without Cancer).

Being radiated at, but radiation is usually just a delay tactic and the side effect of radiation is cancer (source: The Cancer Industry).

Given chemo, which derails your immune system and wrecks your kidneys. If the cancer persists, and it usually does (World Without Cancer by Griffin), your body will require months of recovery before most alternative treatments can help.

If you don't avoid the above course of action, you and your insurance company will spend about $200,000. Consider that one out of four people get cancer, do the math, and you will have a feel for the most significant aspect of the cancer industry: $$$.

Doctors in Favor of Alternatives

Many doctors say that they support alternative treatments. But, these same doctors talk their patients into taking the dangerous conventional treatments first. Then, after chemo has destroyed the patient's immune system, they say, "OK try those alternative cancer treatments now." This is backwards in the extreme. Doesn't it make more sense to take the safer treatments first especially since all conventional treatments are known to cause cancer?

Media vs Cancell

Why you probably haven't heard of Cancell and how its reputation was ruined:

The developer, James Sheridan wished Cancell to be affordable to all cancer sufferers in the world. In negotiations with drug companies he insisted on reasonable prices. This made Cancell unattractive to companies who were making a fortune with chemo most of which have not gone through FDA testing. Most chemos could never pass FDA testing. They are labeled experimental drugs to get around the FDA and to allow them to charge exorbitant prices.

Without FDA approval Sheridan distributed Entelev (the name Cancell was introduced later). In retaliation, the FDA tried to prevent any lab from testing Sheridan's compound while he continued to give it away.

The $7 billion a year Chemo industry titans viewed Cancell as a competitor. Apparently they took advantage of a golden opportunity presented to them by Ed Sopcak who took over the manufacture and distribution of Entelev in 1984 and changed the name to Cancell.

Around 1992, inexplicably, Ed Sopcak completely changed Cancell's formulation to a homeopathic like product that chemically appeared to be water. Suddenly, media interest swelled. Sopcak was interviewed by magazines and a book was written.

Was the Chemo industry responsible for this well timed publicity about a formula that chemically, had nothing to do with the original Cancell formula? To answer that question you can take the Cancer Conspiracy book link near the bottom of this page and read abstracts of nearly twenty books on the subject.

"Official" Statements about Cancell - A Barrage of Falsehood

There are many misleading statements on the web regarding Cancell. These statements can be found on the following links to another page on this web site:

National Cancer Institute

American Cancer Society

FDA

Actual NCI Test Results

Three sets of test results were requested from the National Cancer Institute (NCI):

Test results for Cancell.

Test results for any compound that was not considered worthy of further study. NCI sent test results for perilly alcohol.

Test results for a compound considered worthy of further study. NCI sent test results for taxol a chemo which is often called "the gold standard of chemo."

Test Procedure

NCI initial, in-vitro testing of compounds for anti-tumor activity applies five different concentrations of the compound under test to five human tumor masses of each of 60 different tumor types (5 x 60 =300 tumor masses). After a fixed number of days, NCI measures the change in mass of all 300 tumors. A reduction in mass is indicated by a negative percentage growth number and indicates anti-cancer activity.

Summarizing the Test Results

With 300 tumor masses to track, the test data becomes cumbersome. Therefore, two criterion were developed to summarize the results:

80% hits - the number of tumor types out of the 60 tested that showed 80% or greater reduction in mass.

95% hits - the number of tumor types out of the 60 tested that showed 95% or greater reduction in mass.

Concentration levels are very significant for compounds like Chemo because Chemo is so toxic. However, Cancell is many times less toxic than aspirin. Therefore, for simplicity, all concentrations were lumped together; if any concentration showed a reduction greater than 80% or 95%, it is a hit. This puts toxic compounds like Chemo in a much better light than they deserve, but even so, Cancell demonstrates superior performance in the NCI screening test.

Table 1- Summary of Test Results from NCI

Compound, NCI judgment

NSC Number

Number of Tumor Types That Showed Mass Reductions of at least: *80%                    95%

Perilly alcohol, inactive	641066-T/2	0	0
Taxol, active	125973-L/19	12	9
Cancell, inactive	637907-L/1	32	18

*The total of 80% hits includes all mass reductions of 80% or greater; this includes mass reductions of 95% .

Table 1 clearly shows that Cancell is more active than a popular chemotherapeutic agent NCI judged to be active, taxol, but NCI still judged Cancell inactive. Furthermore, the tests are designed for fast acting compounds like Chemo; Cancell works more slowly. The developer, James Sheridan, felt that Cancell would have completely eliminated the tumor masses if the test was conducted for a longer period. Another researcher, statistician Dr. Irwin Bross examines NCI.

Conspiracy or Just Common Rationalizations?

The FDA harassed the developer James Sheridan and prevented labs from testing his compound. Eventually they placed an injunction against him from distributing Cancell even though no one had reported any adverse side effects.

The FDA's position on Cancell may look different from their point of view. Sheridan was distributing a compound that FDA did not approve, therefore the FDA felt obliged to stop his operation. I would imagine a conversation between an FDA inspector and a test lab that agreed to tests Sheridan's compound would go something like this:

I hear you are testing for James Sheridian. He is involved in illegal activity which we are trying to put a stop to. Anyone supporting him is likely to come under close scrutiny by the FDA. Have a nice day.

It is not likely that any doctor knowingly suppress a cancer cure to protect their business or career. But, every doctor has his or her own ideas about the best treatment based on what they have learned. However, the pharmaceutical companies have an extremely strong influence over what medical doctors are taught. Doctors are too busy to dig into the statistics of cancer treatments, they assume that what they are taught in school are the best treatments. They cannot afford to suspect that these treatments are only the best for the pharmaceutical companies that influence their institutions of "higher learning."

"The thing that bugs me is that people think the Food and Drug Administration is protecting them -- it isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing are as different as night and day." --Dr. Herbert L. Ley, former Commissioner of the FDA. FDA consultants that have pharmaceutical company ties. Whose side is the FDA really on?

Considering Chemo?

In 1987 Dr. Lana Levi, of the University of California wrote, “Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy... It does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancer. This fact has been know for over a decade.. Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemotherapy than without it.”

The above statement is in direct contrast to popular belief because of statements like this:

"1998 was truly one of the most exciting years for cancer research," said Harmon Eyre, MD, executive vice president for research and medical affairs for the American Cancer Society (ACS). "While we are closer than ever to finding answers..." followed by a pitch for more donations.

Who is telling the truth?

In 1986 McGill Cancer Center scientists surveyed 118 oncologists who specialized in lung cancer. They were asked if they would take chemo if they developed lung cancer. Three-quarters replied that they WOULD NOT TAKE CHEMO.

Taken from Reclaiming Our Health by John Robbins, 1996. Published by HJ Kramer, Box 1082, Tiburon, CA 94920.

In 1984 an unusual convention of doctors was held in Chicago. Nine eminent physicians from all over the United States spoke to an auditorium packed with their colleagues. The name of the conference was Dissent in Medicine. The theme at the conference was the propensity of the nation's medical hierarchy to lie to the public. Among the speakers was Alan S. Levin, M.D., professor of immunology at the University of California, San Francisco, Medical School, "Practicing physicians are intimidated into using regimes which they know do not work. One of the most glaring examples is chemotherapy, which does not work for the majority of cancers."

After reading this section about chemo, if you still want to use chemo, seriously consider using chemo without the side effects. Consider using Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT). IPT makes cell membranes more permeable, and increases uptake of drugs into cells. IPT selectively targets tumor cells, which usually have more insulin receptors than normal cells. It also makes tumor cells more susceptible to chemo by modifying cell metabolism. As a result cancer patients can greatly reduce chemo dosage and eliminate most side effects while increasing the effectiveness of chemo. The non-profit IPT web site is run by a local friend, Chris Duffield, Ph.D. whose kindness and concern is plainly obvious to all who meet him.

If you want to learn what a doctor would discover if they researched the statistics of their cancer treatments, read the book World Without Cancer which address surgery, radiation, and chemo effectiveness. So many facts are presented in the book that no doubt remains that this mechanism is accurate. Two obvious conclusions arise: here is another safe, effective cancer treatment and a simple pill-a-day preventative. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical companies in concert with the AMA were able to discredit this treatment, despite successful test results, exactly like NCI did with their test result summary concerning Cancell.

The "War" on Cancer or How to Make a Lot of Money Forever

Summarizing the first 20 years of the war on cancer (during which time $billions of our taxes have poured into the medical industry each year for cancer research) the American Cancer Society (Cancer Facts and Figures 1997 web page, see Links at the page bottom) presents a table showing the percentage of people who die of cancer each year by cancer type. The percentage has risen in more than half the 43 types of cancers studied. The overall percentage of people dying of cancer increased. You might think that this has to do with having a larger older population, but read on:

Regarding conventional treatments, Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. formerly of Sloan-Kettering Cancer center, from his Cancer Chronicles #20 ©March 1994 by :

"It's official. Even the Journal of the American Medical Association now admits that the war on cancer is a failure. An article in the Feb. 9 [1994] issue says that cancer incidence and death rates are rising. Most people knew that smoking-related cancers were on the rise. Now we learn that a "baby boomer's" chances of getting non-smoking-related cancers are double what their grandparent's odds were. "In all age groups, cancer incidence is increasing...," the article reveals.

In addition, "few new, effective treatments have been devised for the most common cancers." This follows similar revelations in Scientific American (2/94)."

Despite the number of people who quit smoking, the percentage for deaths due to lung cancer has increased dramatically. Something is basically wrong with conventional wisdom regarding cancer. On the other hand alternative treatments are working exactly the way they should, but doctors continue to attack their effectiveness.

How Alternative Treatments are Successfully Attacked

Alternative treatments usually treat the cause of an illness, but each illness can have a number of causes. Therefore, each alternative cancer treatment is effective on a smaller percentage* of cases than something like chemo which works on the symptoms. Chemo will often reduce the size of tumors, but they start growing again because chemo does not addressing the cause of the cancer. The good news is that you can try a number of alternative treatments at the same time. This is a tremendous advantage over chemo which make it almost impossible for any other treatment to work because of the destruction of the immune system among other things.

* This is not true of Cancell which works directly on Cancer cells not on the cause of the cancer and therefore has a higher effectivity than most alternatives. For this reason, using Laetrile which does work on a Cancer cause it an excellent combination and does not interfere with each other.

What Chemo Does

Chemo kills. It killed my sister who died of pneumonia after chemo destroyed her immune system. Renal failure has killed many others after chemo destroyed their kidneys. There are so many accusations about the abuses inherent with conventional cancer treatment that no less than eight books have explored "the cancer conspiracy." See Links.

Children in Hospitals

The medical profession has used sympathy for children to pass unbelievable laws that allow them to do anything they want to your child with or without your permission. One woman put her son was in a Utah children's hospital for cancer. During his short stay, three children died as the result of their first chemo treatment (the deaths were not reported as due to chemo). Two other mothers became terrified that chemo would be given to their children and had to sue the hospital to get their children out.

Hospitals will pump a child full of any drug they can think of with or without your permission. They will take your child away if you disagree with their treatment even if it makes your child worse. Get the paperwork that you must sign for admission as soon as possible and take it to a lawyer (there is usually a week or two between the decision to hospitalize and the actually hospitalization). Cross out any words that may cause you a loss of control over your child's treatment. Have the lawyer prepare a letter stating that you will sue them immediately if they refuse to admit your child because you want to maintain control over your child's treatment. Tell the hospital that you want the right to prevent them from giving your child chemo if you decide that is not the right treatment and that you want the paperwork to reflect that. Most releases in hospitals don't allow you any control over the treatment of a child, cross that insanity out. Prepare to "find a different doctor" if you start to lose control over what your child is receiving.

Why Doctors Don't Prescribe Cancell

Any treatment that you can obtain and self-administer threatens to remove your doctor from their treatment program. Although your doctor may not object to this, the American Medical Association (AMA) is strongly opposed to such a trend. For this reason the AMA has pushed for legislation to prevent the public from ever being exposed to alternatives. They have succeeded:

From the Office of Technology Assessment United States Congress, Archive of 1990, "Because their practices fall outside of standard medical practice, physicians who offer unconventional cancer treatments are vulnerable to the civil charge of malpractice."

From Dr. Moss's book, Questioning Chemotherapy (see Links) the estimated worldwide sales of all anti-cancer agents for 1997 is $11 billion. This includes cytotoxics and hormone treatments; cytokines; and anti-emetics. Cytotoxics (harmful compounds like chemo) represent about two-thirds of the market or about $7 billion.

If you operated a drug company and had a well known product that doctors were always prescribing, wouldn’t you do all you could to promote your product and prevent competitive products from being used? What kind of promotion does a $7 billion a year product inspire?

Drug companies have the ear of most doctors. Meanwhile, Sheridan can't even get acknowledged by the medical community because he isn't a medical doctor.

Effectiveness and Response Time

By 1940, Sheridan had a compound which he tested to be 38% effective. He continued improving the formulation using laboratory animals. Eventually over 20,000 animal experiments were performed and, by 1953 the development stage ended. Currently the Humanitarian Organization of People for Entelev (H.O.P.E.) organization, a support group for cancer sufferers, estimate the effectiveness of Entelev at 80% for all cancers. They report higher rates on some specific cancers such as brain tumors and effectiveness in children is lower than 80%. This seems to be related to the higher level of growth common in the cells of children.

How to Tell if Cancell is Working

When malignant cells go past the primitive state, they lyse or self-digest. When the malignant cells, self-digest, they change from cancer to waste material, composed of two amino acids that have the appearance of raw white eggs, which are mostly excreted through normal body waste disposal or in the case of lung cancer, this material is coughed up.

Tumor Markers

Tumor markers can raise for three to four months after taking Cancell. This does not mean that Cancell is not working.

Response Time

Different people respond at different speeds to Cancell. Some cancer sufferers notice response in a week and virus symptoms can go away in one day. However, it can take as much as three months or more for some cancer sufferers to notice improvement especially for Lymphomas. The lymph system has a very slow circulation rate. This slows down the action of Cancell. In the words of James Sherdian, "Cancell takes time to work... 7 to 9 weeks is typical and some cases take up to 3 months or more to see a response."

One of the reasons for Cancell's apparent slow action is due to the time it takes a person's system to convert the tumors to waste matter and longer to recover from the damage the tumor produced. Often the waste matter around a tumor is misread by a doctor as tumor growth and a person stops taking Cancell before it is finished working. This tragedy is difficult to prevent.

Selecting the Right Cancer Treatment

If you can obtain samples of the different treatments you are considering, you you might be interested in a technique called Applied Kinesiology. This technique has to do with energy.

Applied Kinesiology. It is a very well documented procedure, but not well known. You can find practitioners of Applied Kinesiology in the chiropractic profession. You can also buy a book about it called Your Body Doesn't Lie by Diamond. It was written 20 years ago and is still in print. That is extremely long lived for a book on alternate health.

Have you ever heard of "The Celestine Prophecy" by James Redfield? It was number one the New York Times bestsellers list for more than a year. It is a story about the emergency and growing acceptance of energy (sometimes referred to as spiritual energy, personal energy…). I have worked daily with this energy for personal healing for twenty years and can say that it has given me powerful insights and abilities. Most things have an energy signature that your body can sense. Applied Kinesiology uses this energy to allow your body to decide which meds to take. It is easy to tell if a body can do this by first holding a vitamin in your hand and then a poison; the results are impressive and right before you eyes. The containers need to be identical so you can't tell which is which.

Recommending Cancell to Others

Since you, a non-medical doctor, are recommending Cancell, your friend or relative may need to see a lot of information before he or she will try it. Such detailed information is almost impossible to deliver in a conversation. Printed material is most convincing even if you read it to him or her. If you can't prove that conventional doctors receive only pharmaceutical company influenced information, your friend or relative will follow their doctor. So unless they have already rejected conventional treatments, consider giving them or reading to them a print out of the World Without Cancer excerpts and let them absorb that information before presenting any additional information. It may take a print out of the NCI test results and a lengthy explanation of the columns, but try starting with the excerpts.

Ordering Cancell

If you are recommending Cancell to a friend or relative, you do not need ordering information. Go to Recommending Cancell.

Cancell is a tool that must be used skillfully. Also, you may have to give up some foods or medicines you are currently taking. Therefore, please read and consider all the information in the following sections before ordering Cancell, Laetrile, or additional supplements.

Cancell Cost

A four to six month (depends on which dosage method used) supply costs about $170, half size is available. Although this is a reasonable cost, other supplements should also be considered which can double the eventual cost.

Important Considerations

Be sure to read the following sections to determine if you are currently taking something that interferes with Cancell. If you must continue to take something that interferes with Cancell, there is no sense in continueing to study the ordering information. If you have already read the following information and want to skip ahead, click here.

What to Avoid

Cancell is a delicate treatment whose effect can be stopped by a number of substances. Before continuing with the ordering information, decide if you are willing to avoid taking all of the substances listed below that interfere with Cancell.

Foods to Avoid

Reducing your intake of refined sugar had been known to aid the effects of Cancell. Fructose, honey, 100% maple syrup are much better.

Vitamins to Avoid

High concentrations of the following substances have been known to interfere with Cancell (naturally occurring quantities in food has not caused any problems):

• Vitamin C (taking vitamin C is the number one reason that Cancell fails to work)

• Vitamin E

• Selenium

• CoEnzyme Q10

Treatments to Avoid

• Essiac (often given in a tea)

• Ozone treatments

• 714-x recent cases (Sept 00) indicate that 714-x may interfere with Cancell

• Hydrogen peroxide

• Colloidal silver - the heavy metal quality of silver could react cause a reaction with Cancell.

Treatments that Can Be Taken with Cancell

The following do not interfere with Cancell as far as experience has shown: 5FU * Avonex (an interferon - very toxic)

• Aloe

• Aspirin

• Ambrotose (plant saccharides)

• Betaine hydrocholoride

• Biotin

• Blue Green Algae (believed to have no problems with Cancell, but no case history to verify)

• Borage oil

• Boron Calcium

• Celebrex

• Chromium

• Choline

• Colostrum

• Coumadin (an anti-coagulant)

• Diuretics in general

• Elavil

• Endocet

• Fish oil (EPA, DHA)

• Folic acid

• Glucosamine/chondroitin

• Glutamic acid hydrochloride

• Grape seed extract

• hormone inhibitors

• Hydrochlorothiazide

• Interferion (although it is highly toxic)

• Inositol

• Iodine

• Lisinopril

• Lasix

• Lemon bioflavonoids

• Linolenic acid Magnesium

• Manganese

• Megace (Megestrol Acetate)

• Melatonin (occasionally)

• Metoprolol tartrate

• MGN3 (probable compatibility)

• Oxycontin

• Pantothenic acid

• Para-aminobenz acid

• Percacette

• Percocet

• Prevacid

• Potassium

• Pregnenolone

• Prednisone

• Rice bran

• Rose hips (if the level of vitamin C is low)

• Rutin

• Saw palmetto

• Shark liver oil (Life Extension recommends not longer than one month of treatment)

• Secal and Entergenic concentrate

• Silica Hydride

• Simvastatin

• Sulindac

• Tenormin

• Thymic Protein A

• Ukraine

• Vanadium

• Venus Fly Trap

• Zink

• Zolodex

* 5FU is considered by some to be chemo. This is a misleading label. The definition of chemo in most dictionary states that chemo is any drug used in the treatment of cancer. Under this definition 5FU is chemo. However, common usage determined the definition of a word. The common usage definition for chemo would be an extremely toxic substance. Under the common usage definition, 5FU should not be considered chemo.

It is generally suggested that herbs be discontinued because it is unknown how they will react with Cancell. Other substances whose reaction with Cancell is currently unknown:

• Cat's Claw

• Vilcora (Cat's Claw)

• Digoxina

• Enalapril

• Espironolactona

• Ranitidina

• Sales de potasio

Additional Ordering Considerations

The following sections contain ordering information that needs to be considered in many cases:

• Cancell Dosage and Response Time - how difficult it is to take Cancell

• Discussing Cancell with You Doctor

• Cancell and Surgery

• Toxicity and Side Effects

If the above subjects don't apply to you, proceed to Order Information or return to Main Menu.

Cancell Dosage

Before ordering, consider how hard it may be for you or the patient to take Cancell. A quarter teaspoon of the strong tasting Cancell liquid must be taken at regular intervals. Do not eat for 15 minutes before or after taking Cancell. There are three dose methods:

1. Every six hours day and night. This means four doses everyday.

2. Every 4 hours and if you want to sleep eight hours straight you can double the dose you take right before bed and skip the middle-of-the-night dose. This means that you will take Cancell five times a day with the last dose being one half teaspoon.

3. If oral administration is not possible, Cancell can be administered rectally. Use a syringe or eye dropper and a quarter of a teaspoon of Cancell. Insert the dropper or syringe just past the rectal muscle and dispense the Cancell. Avoid bowel movements for at least 20 minutes.

Actually, the more often you take Cancell the better. However, if you intend to exceed six doses a day, the dosage size should be reduced. For example. taking Cancell every two hours only requires a dosage size of an 1/8 of a teaspoon.

Continued Use

Some people want to continue Cancell after remission. I know of one person who continues to take Cancell five years after his remission; no side effects have been observed. However, do not reduce the dosage size or schedule of Cancell. CANCELL WILL NOT WORK at all if you reduce the amount or frequency of dosages.

Discussing Cancell with Your Doctor

If you want to discuss cancell with your doctor, first:

Print out the three NCI test results.

Give these test results to your doctor along with the NCI statement about Cancell: "Cancell did not demonstrate a biological effect considered worthy of further study."

Wait until he or she has enough time to understand the test results. Your doctor may claim he or she does not have the time or can't understand the test results. If your doctor doesn't have the time or ability to learn about different cancer treatments, should they be treating you?

If your doctor agrees that NCI lied, then you know that he or she understands the test results and you can discuss Cancell without your doctor trying to intimidate you with anger and threats to discontinue care (their usual tactic). If they try that tactic, you may have to remind them of the oath they took and whose body it is.

Your doctor should give you at least as much control over "repair decisions" as your automobile mechanic.

If your doctor responds with an open mind, tell him or her that you are going to take Cancell and want them to remain a source of information, support, and test results as you take charge of your health.

Many doctors appear to have an open mind to alternatives and then try and convince you to take conventional treatments first. Taking conventional treatments, which tend to spread and cause cancer, before taking safe alternatives is backwards in the extreme.

The Best Way to Make the Treatment Decision

The best way to make the treatment decision is to make that decision at home surrounded by the people that love you (or the patient). The doctors office is the worst place to make this decision because of the tremendous outside influence and intimidating surroundings. If you (or the patient) agree to make the decision at home, then you can have a decision that each of you can live with.

Having Surgery?

In order to present your anesthesiologist with a normally oxygenated body, it is a good idea to stop taking Cancell 48 hours before surgery and then start Cancell 48 hours after the surgery. This stoppage will not significantly set back your progress with Cancell.

CRITICAL INFORMATION

As Cancell works and tumors start to break down, they can appear to get larger. CAT scans sometimes can't distinguish between growing tumors and tumors that are breaking down, but a PET scan can verify the breakdown of tumors.

Cancell is sold in a four and two month supplies (if taking the every four hour method) because it can take a while for your body to convert all the cancer to an easily removable substance.

Toxicity and Side Effects

Although Sheridan failed to get a lab to perform a toxicity test on Entelev, one interested group succeeded in getting the test performed by changing the name. This group fears reprisals from the FDA and have requested that I not include the cover-name they used and the date of the test. However, the results of the test can be published. This test was made using the original, dark Cancell - Entelev.

Standard Toxicity Testing Procedure

Toxicity tests establish the level of a compound at which half the test mice die. The level is expressed in terms of milligrams per kilogram of the animal’s body weight. For example, the toxicity of aspirin is 390mg/kilo; if each mouse weighed a kilogram half of them would die if they were each given 390 mg. The test procedure for new compounds is to slowly increase the level of the compound until half the mice die.

Toxicity Test Results for Entelev

The test lab started the test in the normal way and eventually tested levels of hundreds of milligrams per kilo of body weight and no mice died. When the lab got to a level of 5000mg/kilo of body weight they stopped the gradual increments because no mice had yet died. They jumped the level to 11,000 mg per kilo of body weight and finally 70% of the mice died. This level is the equivalent of a 150 LB man taking 700 pills of 1000 mg (“horse” pills).

Side Effects

Cancell does not seem to have any side effect except that, initially a person may feel tired. On average tiredness lasts 2 1/2 weeks, but some patients report it lasts longer. This is an indication that Cancell is working.

One woman mistakenly drank an entire bottle of Cancell and only experienced diarrhea the next day. She discovered her mistake and started taking the correct dosage, one teaspoon per day. She is now cured of cancer.

As with many strong tasting liquids, Cancell has reportedly caused nausea when taken by the seriously sick. When this happens, some people have switched to rectal administration.

Due to the many changes a woman’s body goes through during pregnancy, Cancell is not recommended during pregnancy just to be on the safe side.

Imagery and Attitude

Do you believe in positive visualizations? I wish you are now able to occasionally create the imagine of viewing the test results that indicate a successful outcome after using Cancell. If you and your loved ones can create that image and feel that joy, you are turning around the negative energy that is generated from worry. Few people realize the power or presence of negative visualizations. Most people think that worrying demonstrates caring. Worry is negative visualization. If you catch yourself engaged in worry, use the above image to undo the damage caused by this form of negative visualization.

Focus on positive sights and sounds. Surround yourself with beauty and music. Everyone I know who has done this, has marveled at its effect:

• Get a little book of blank pages.

• Everyday, write down something you enjoyed the day before.

• If at first you can't think of anything, go with that. Some people call this meditation. If you don't have one, you can use mine:

• Stop the voice in your mind

• Imagine a beautiful rose and hold that image.

• Breath deeply relaxing completely on your exhale.

• It doesn't matter how small a thing you enjoyed. Actually, the smaller the better. The more the merrier, but even one deserves a celebration, it could have been the feeling of sunlight on your skin, a smile from a friend, anything pleasant.

Other Diseases

Cancell has been effective against viruses including AIDS, Herpes (see below), Chronic Fatigue syndrome, lupus, endimetriosis, Crohn's disease, fibromyalgia, and has some success treating: ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease), Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, Leukemia, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Scleroderma. Information about these diseases and Cancell will be added as I continue my research. I don't have any more information on the above diseases that don't have a link, please contact HOPE for more information.

The mechanism that that occurs when Cancell is given to an AIDS patient is that Cancell strips the protective layer off the viruses allowing the bodies immune system to attack them. This results in an initial increase in viral count when the Cancell treatments start. There are not actually more viruses, they are just more detectable due to the removal of this protective layer.

Colds and Flu

Cancell has demonstrated strong anti-viral abilities against most viruses including colds and flu. It can be exceptionally helpful for people like myself who take a long time to get rid of these common illnesses. My usual run with a cold is two weeks and some flues have persisted for six weeks. Now that I use Cancell, neither of these conditions remain for more than three days and my symptoms are reduced by about 70% soon after taking my first dose.

Herpes

The book the Cancell Controversy by Louise Trull reports that 15 cases of herpes were treated with Cancell by physicians with positive cures in every case within 3 to 6 days. However, extensive follow ups were not performed. Recent case histories indicate you should start taking Cancell after an episode starts and continue taking Cancell for one month after symptoms disappear. One of the current Cancell manufacturer suggests that you finish the entire bottle which takes four to six months. Clearly, more study is needed. Read more about this book here. To order Cancell for Herpes ($170 for a four month supply), first go to Cancell Protocols for Herpes.

Cost

Cancell cost $170 for a four month supply. Most sources also sell a two month supply for about half that price.

Cancell Testimonial Video

In 1990, Mark Waters produced a video about cancell called At Whose Expense? -The Suppression of a Cancer Cure That Works. The video is 55 minutes long and has interviews with several folks who used Cancell. If you would like a copy e-mail Mark Waters at WatersInk@AOL.com or call Backcountry Productions, Longmont, CO (303) 772-8358

HOPE

The Humanitarian Organization Of People For Entelev (HOPE) for people who either:

• Successfully cured their cancer using Cancell, and volunteer to share their experience with cancer patients.

• Are currently using Cancell and want to talk with people who have beaten cancer.

• Are friends or relatives of Cancer patients and want to know more about Cancell.

The Current president: Ms. Ollie Blezinski,27640 Van Horn, New Boston, Michigan 48164 Tel: (734) 783-5558

HOPE holds a monthly meeting in Michigan, where they disseminate information to people who would like to know more about Cancell. People who have used Cancell give testimonials at the meetings.

Preventatives

It seems that Cancell would be an excellent cancer preventative, but cancell must be taken multiple times a day on a strict schedule. Taking Cancell on a reduced schedule, WILL NOT WORK. Although I use Cancell for viral infections, I don't use Cancell as a cancer preventative. I use Laetrile and Pancreatin.

From World Without Cancer by Griffin (second edition Jan 1997, Trade format) page 100, "Dr. Krebs has suggested a minimum level of fifty milligrams of B17 per day for a normal, healthy adult. Naturally, one who is pre-disposed to cancer would require more, and one who already was afflicted with the disease would need much more. The average apricot seed grown in the United States contains approximately four or five milligrams of B17. But this is an average figure and can vary by as much as a factor of six." This is why I take the little 100 milligram pills. I try to take two 100 milligram B17 pills and two Pancreatin pills every day.

History of Entelev/Cancell

Entelev was developed by a chemist, James Sheridan of Rosell, Michigan. Since his original formula the following names have been used: Sheridan's Formula, Jim's Juice, Crocinic Acid, JS-114, JS-101, 126-F, Entelev, Cancell, Cantron, and Protocel.

Sheridan theorized the possibility of chemically controlling the energy needed by the cells of our body to cause energy low cancer cells to revert to a state where the body can eliminate them as foreign matter. The theory postulates that cancer cells are too energy low to proceed with their normal development. Cancer cells stop their development just short of differentiating into a normal liver, lung, brain ... cell. Sheridan proposed to push cancer cells backward in their development instead of try to encourage them to differentiate.

Sheridan believed he had found a method of controlling the energy available to cells in the early 1930s after witnessing a chemical reaction called rhythmic banding in an analytical chemistry laboratory at Carnegie Tech and reading the Debye Theory, published in 1927 which explores the effects of changing the dielectric constant on reactions of positive and negative ions suggested the means to accomplish this energy reduction.

About 1950, Sheridan was invited to join the staff of the Detroit Institute of Cancer Research. There he performed the required chemical work on the project and the institute experts performed the animal tests. In late 1953, the institute director concluded that Entelev was ready for a clinical program. A committee was formed consisting of the Dean of Medicine at Wayne University, three oncologists from area hospitals, and the director. The committee spent several days interviewing the experts who were running the tests, reviewed the test results and concluded that the material was ready for a clinical program. The director of the Detroit Institute of Cancer Research informed the American Cancer Society about the product. A meeting was requested to take place in New York City. The director and the Dean attended the meeting. They returned and reported that the American Cancer Society did not approve the test because Mr. Sheridan did not prove that he owned the idea. Sheridan was later fired.

Since Sherdian had worked on his idea for many years, it would be fairly easy to show that the idea was his, but Sheridan was fired. Why he was fired is not a mystery if you know how diabolical the pharmaceutical companies are. During the Nuremberg war crimes trials, executives of German pharmaceutical companies were the only civilians who received prison sentences. The descendent companies of these same executives are now operate world wide and receive great respect from the uninformed. An example of such a company is none other than Bayer the aspirin giant that many people think is an American company. These pharmaceutical companies control medical research by giving or withholding grants for research. Moss's book The Cancer Industry is full of such dirty dealing.

Ready for People

Based on the animal testing, Sheridan knew that Entelev was non-toxic and started giving it to friends who were at the “end of the line.” Word spread of the effects it had on these people and Sheridan started receiving requests from all over the country. Unable to refuse to give people a chance for life, he began distributing it for free to anyone who asked for it. The FDA eventually placed an injunction against the distribution of Entelev.

Ed Sopcak Joins the Effort

Around 1984, a cancer sufferer (who wishes to remain nameless) was given the prognosis of six weeks to live due to advanced cancer. Instead of dying on schedule, he acquired a bottle of Entelev and in six weeks he was declared cancer-free. Unfortunately, Sheridan had recently quit distributing Entelev in response to a court injunction because he had not gained FDA approval. This nameless man had written six technical books, and was competent to understand the formulation so Sheridan gave it to him, but he didn’t have the equipment for production. Mr. Nameless contacted a friend, Ed Sopcak who is a metallurgist. Sopcak agreed to make it and eventually started working with Sheridan and distributing it for free between 1984 and 1992.

The FDA Blockade

With their own money Sheridan and Sopcak continued to seek FDA approval. The FDA required toxicity testing. Sheridan and Sopcak decided to pay for this testing because they couldn’t get help from the drug company influenced cancer agencies. Sheridan found what he considered the best laboratory in the country in New Mexico. The cost of the toxicity test was originally $5,000. After they got the material, they called Jim and said it would cost $7,000. Sheridan and Sopcak still agreed. The cost went to $15,000. Still Sheridan and Sopcak agreed. Then the lab called and said for some reason or other they were unable to do it.

Sheridan drove to the lab and said he would like to have a toxicity test run. They said they could have it done within a week. After hearing that the material was Entelev, everything changed. They absolutely couldn't get around to doing it. This treatment continued for years. Some people would say that the $700 billion a year Chemo industry has something to do with this blockade. Eventually, Sheridan retired and no longer pursues the battle.

The Formulation Change / Name Confusion / Reputation Destruction

Ed Sopcak worked with James Sheridan, the developer, by distributing Entelev (the original name for Cancell, see History above) under the name Cancell between 1984 and 1992. Sopcak's efforts and connections greatly increased public awareness of Cancell. For this reason the term Cancell is used most often when refering to Entelev. Around 1992 Sopcak changed the formulation completely. Sopcak’s new formula resembled a homeopathic product. He stated that it was distilled water “programmed vibrationally.” At this point Sopcak should have changed the name of the product he was manufacturing, but he continued to call it Cancell because he felt that both formulas worked the same way even though they were chemically as different as night and day. Entelev was a dark liquid. Sopcak's new formula was completely clear and contained none of the chemicals that Sheridan had specified. Eventually, Sopcak did change the name of his formula to Quantrol, but the damage to Cancell's reputation continued. This web page uses the term Cancell to refer to the dark formula.

Not long after the formulation change, Quantrol/Cancell received a lot of media attention. Sopcak promoted Quantrol on TV and in articles often referring to it as Cancell and created tremendous confusion. Suddenly, after distributing Cancell for eight years Sopcak was taken to court by the FDA creating more publicity for his "water" and making Cancell seem like a joke. With the wrong formula receiving this negative attention, Cancell's reputation was dealt a devastating blow.

Sopcak Gets Stopped but Distribution Continues

The courts stopped Sopcak from distributing either formula, but during that time a company in Florida started producing Entelev based on a formula forwarded by an intermediary. In 1984 Medical Research Products obtained the Entelev formula and started producing it under the name Cantron. In the spring of 2000 a Canadian company started working with the Sheridan family and called their product Protocel. So now there are two manufacturers. Both charge about the same price. Both products have the same ingredients which are the same as Entelev although there is a slight difference in the quantity of the ingredients.

Radic

In 1999 a product called Radic appeared on the market. It seems that Radic is some kind of Cancell purchased from one source or other, placed in a different bottle and marked up 400%.

Humor is Still the Best Medicine

For years I collected only the best jokes that friends sent me. That collection is now 90 pages long (269 KB). Click here to download an RTF version of my joke collection. Any text editor such as MS Word can read RTF files.

Fred Reed is the police reporter for the Washington Post. After witnessing the horrors found in the streets of Washington D.C. it seems Freed sometimes wants to write about the more humorous side of life. Some of his freelance articles will keep you laughing for hours.

• Ballistic Missile Defense?

• In Search of Rocks

• Fred takes shots at Feminists

• A Codpiece For Clinton

• Radioactive Goat-Curd

• The Weirdness Of It All

• How Space Aliens Greased The Turn

• Marrying With Abandon

• Art You Could Lube A Truck With

• Sour Thoughts On Multiculturalism

• The Unsurprising Decline Of Newspapers

• The Sorrowful Rise Of Neuter Man

Links to Related Information

Cancer Conspiracy books The term conspiracy has become extremely unfashionable. It is popular to label anyone who points out a conspiracy as paranoid. This reaction is so prevalent that we have developed into a society of closed minds. Open up a bit and consider what powerful drug companies have accomplished after decades of a Congress for sale. The legislation drug companies have managed to get passed has a real effect on anyone who becomes sick.

Alternative Cancer Treatments The most extensive site on alternative cancer treatments on the web. Produced by Robert Hurt, an independent researcher who has collected information since 1993. This site also contains instructions for joining an e-mail group to discuss cancer and related issues.

Dr. Moss's book, Questioning Chemotherapy (click to buy book from Amazon.com). A personal statement from Dr. Moss on chemotherapy.

If you still want to use chemo, seriously consider using chemo without the side effects. Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT) makes tumor cells more susceptible to chemo by modifying cell metabolism. As a result cancer patients can greatly reduce chemo dosage and eliminate most side effects while increasing the effectiveness of chemo.

Louise Trull’s book, “The CanCell Controversy” available from Hampton Roads Publishing, $10 plus shipping, 800-766-8009, 134 Burgess Lane, Charlotesville, Va, 22902 This book should be read with care because it confuses the clear Cancell with the dark Cancell. The clear Cancell is not the same as the dark Cancell and comes with many restrictions and complications that do not apply to the real, dark Cancell. Clear Cancell is not sold any more and was not developed by James Sherdian.

Reduction in deaths due to cancer (normalized to account for population growth)

History of the Cancell project by Ed Sopcak's daughter, Mary Sahs. They get to tell their side of the story.

About.com this general information web site speaks out about cancer research.

Sumeria a beautiful collection of resources for exploring alternative ideas in health, science, and spirituality. This link brings you directly to their cancer table of contents. You will have to click on the Sumeria link at the bottom of this page to find the more attractive elements of this site.

Center for Empirical Medicine dedicated to publicizing alternative medical thinking and to the public's right to objective information.

Alternate Health Essentials explains the failure of conventional medicine to care for Americans.

Cancer Cures? An extensive list of links to cancer articles by Body Wise independent consultant.

International Advocates for Health Freedom Legal beagles fighting to keep food supplements like Cancell from being treated like drugs. If the FDA succeeds in their attempts at such control, many supplements will not longer be available.

Alternative Treatments compiled by Roger G. Worthington, P.C.

Stop Cancer.com offers a guaranteed cure "from a group of doctors who have found the secret to destroying cancer using natural & superior treatments as God intended." This web site emphasizes PH balancing. The guarantee does not apply to people who have taken chemo.

Cancer Victors and Friends A volunteer organization founded in 1963 to promote natural, non-toxic alternative medicine. They have many local chapters that have monthly meetings. This link is for the Northern California chapter.

Fighting Cancer - cancer treatment options and cancer patient support designed to help you make your own decisions concerning alternative cancer treatments. Run by Jonathan Chamberlain the author of Fighting Cancer - A Survival Guide. Visitors to this site can be downloaded the book free of charge.

Trans-Hyperborean Institute of Science The latest advances in healing music, multimedia, and vibrational medicine.

Cancer Research - A Super Fraud the most thorough examination of cancer research on the web, a must read for any one considering chemo.

OncoLink Cancer News.

Dr. Sanford's Alternative Medicine and Science Center advanced technology in alternative medicine.

The Unio Mystica Healing Center offers a NEW form of Metaphysical Healing, sometimes called Spiritual, Psychic, or Absent Healing. It is safe and effective for all physical diseases like cancer, AIDS, chronic fatigue, diabetes, allergies, etc. It is also used for emotional and mental illness, like depression and dysfunctional relationships. Unio Mystica teaches the Science of Deliberate Creation. They do this through weekly personal email. They believe that if you keep thinking about things in the same way that you always have, you will recreate the situations and circumstances you are currently striving to change. For each session their healers work remotely to accomplish such things as Clearing your Akashic Record, repairing and strengthening your chakra, aura, nadis and meridian systems…. One seccion costs $150, one session a week for ten weeks costs $1200.

Parting Shots

If you feel outraged at how NCI abuses suffering people by spreading disinformation about an alternative treatment, consider adding this to your e-mail signature:

If the National Cancer Institute claims that a cancer treatment is ineffective, but their own test results show that it is extremely effective, are they guilty of murder?

Avoid being a victim, visit this non-commercial site: http://www.handpen.com/Cancell/cancell.htm

---

If you don't want to mess with your e-mail signature please consider sending a global message to friends and colleagues. They may know someone right now who needs Cancell.

Finding the Cancell Home Page

You can tell friends to search for The Cancell Home Page in any major search engine to locate links to the Cancell Home page.

---

Cancell

Cancell is currently manufactured under the trade name Cantron, by Medical Research Products (MRP), Miami, FL. MRP who has been manufacturing Cantron since 1984 and a newer Canadian company Remission and Wellness who use the trade name Protocel. A two to three month supply (16 ounces, the duration of use depends on which of the dosage schedules you select) is about $90. A four to six month supply (32 ounces) is about $170.

Overseas Orders

See the Overseas Orders section after the Cantron and Protocel sections.

Cantron

To order Cantron online from a US distributor of Medical Research Products (MRP) with a credit card click here. You can make online orders from Cancer Choices.

To order Cantron over the phone directly from Medical Research Products (MRP)

Inside USA: (800) 443-3030

Outside USA: 305 628-0981

Fax: 305 628-2091

Mail orders: MRP, 3960 NW 167th St., Miami, FL 33054

MRP supports wire transfer. Email Gary Godin.

Protocel

Remission and Wellness manufacturers Cancell under the trade name Protocel, but they have been unable to provide the simplest evidence of proper protocol information, have many problems with orders, and have demonstrated such incompetence that I can no longer recommend them. I believe the product they distribute is effective, but the listed ingredients may confuse some people. Internet users with slower web connections or who have trouble with the shorter URL below may want to try this URL:

http://www.Buyprotocel.com/www-Buyprotocel-com/home.chk?AOLHelp=977632140.718.92.1&ServerName=www.Buyprotocel.com

The above URL is an example of the problems that I have experienced with this company. If you have a faster internet connection try:

http://www.Buyprotocel.com

They also have an toll free numbers on their web site for different location.

Overseas Orders

There have been difficulties sending orders to these countries:

• South Africa

• Netherlands

• Germany

• Mexico

• Poland

Purchasing Cancell in the United States and Shipping it Overseas

For any country that you send Cancell to write these three things on the customs forms:

• Cancell is a dietary supplement not a medication.

• For personal use only.

• Always mail the instructions (and invoice if needed) separately. Do not place any literature or even a letter in the shipment; medicines need instructions, food supplements don't.

• Fed Ex, UPS, Airborne Express, have much higher rates than the post office and the packages are more closely inspected by customs. The post office offers a service called Global Express Mail which the least expensive way to send internationally.

• When shipping to Germany, try to ship to a commercial address. Then have it sent to its destination.

• Israel requires a notarized certificate of origin form stating that it is not dangerous or harmful in any way. It must also state that it is a dietary supplement only and not a medication.

• Mexico & Poland may not accept the package when the true value of the Cancell is stated on the customs forms. Only when identified as gift or sample is it allowed into the country. Don’t forget to write for personal use only and not a medication on the customs label.

• Neither South Africa nor the Netherlands will accept any vitamins or dietary supplements of any kind. Such are considered a medication and will be very difficult to be accepted by customs. The best way is to try to carry it when you travel there. After living overseas for six years I learned that the mention of diarrhea makes customes officials go away. Keep Cancell in a thermos and say "it is a coffee based drink that prevents diarrhea." Don't carry any literature on you.

Questions?

MRP Gary Godin (gpg911@aol.com)

R & W Bob Ish (protocel@charter.net)

Cancell web site webmaster Paul Winter (paul@handpen.com).

---

How Entelev/Cancell Works
by James Vincent Sheridan & James Edward Sheridan

INTRODUCTION

This explanation is indeed for the laymen. there are generalizations and simplifications of very complex material. professionals in the fields of medicine and biochemistry may feel the need for more detail. such detail is presented in other writings. this paper is intended as only a general overview for those without technical backgrounds.

CELLULAR RESPIRATION

An understanding of Entelev/Cancell requires a basic understanding of the respiratory system of the human cell. Most people think of respiration as breathing, taking oxygen into the body and letting out carbon dioxide through the lungs. However, every living cell in the body is technically involved in respiration, because the word means more than simply breathing. Respiration is a chemical reaction in the cell which involves oxygen and which provides energy to the cell. The respiration system in the cell has the job of manufacturing and delivering energy in the cell so that the various functions of the cell can be carried out. For example, muscle cells need energy to conduct and all cells need energy to grow and divide. Thus, respiration has the more general meaning of providing energy through the respiration systems of the cell.

OXIDATION REDUCTION SYSTEM

One of the most important parts of the respiratory system in the cells is called the oxidation reduction system. Indeed, in many respects, referring to the oxidation reduction system of the cell is much the same as referring to the respiration system. This is because, in the cell the oxidation reduction system produces energy for the cell to do it's work. Scientists sometimes refer to the oxidation reduction system as the "redox system"

The oxidation reduction system can be thought of as a ladder, with a different chemical reaction taking place on each step. The respiratory reaction which takes place on each step of this ladder is the same in that it produces energy for the cell to do it's work, but each step is also different from every other in the sense of how effective the reaction is. The bottom steps of the ladder involve relatively simple or "primitive" respiratory reactions. An example of a primitive reaction would be yeast while it's fermenting. Keep in mind that this is still an amazingly complex reaction. It is only primitive compared to the other reactions in the oxidation reproduction system.

The higher steps involve more complex respiratory reactions. The primitive reactions at the bottom of the ladder take place without oxygen being present. The higher respiratory reaction require the presence of oxygen. generally, for reduction you move down the ladder. For oxidation you move up the ladder.

Each step on this ladder is a different potential. Potential means a measurable electrical voltage like a small battery would have. Primitive yeast cells which are fermenting will give off a very small amounts of electrical energy, or movement of electrons. As you move toward the top of the ladder, potential energy increases. The top of the ladder has a potential of about +0.4 volts while the bottom is about 0.2 volts.

ENZYMES REGULATE CELLULAR RESPIRATION

Enzymes are involved in each of the steps of the respiratory ladder. Indeed, part of the oxidation reduction system within each cell is an enzymes system. In every living cell there are many different enzymes. Some of the enzymes are related primarily to respiration system of the cell. With these enzymes the respiration system could not function and the cell would have no energy to do it’s work.

Enzymes can help chemical reactions take place. an enzyme may even make a reaction possible or may speed up a reaction which otherwise might require a great deal of time. Respiration is one chemical reaction that enzymes help. Even in the lungs, where most of us think respiration takes place. Enzymes help make the oxygen usable for the body.

Each step on the oxidation reduction ladder has a different enzyme from every other step. While certain off these enzymes are very similar to others in structure, they are still different enough to involve them in a different position on the ladder of respiratory reactions.

The major distinction between the primitive (bottom) respiratory reactions and the advanced (higher) respiratory reactions is that the primitive reactions do not use oxygen, while the advanced reactions do. Thus, in respiratory reactions below this dividing line (the primitive part of the system) the movement of electrons does not rely on the presence of oxygen. Generally the movement of electrons in reactions above this dividing line on the ladder require oxygen. There are a few situations above this line where oxygen is not used. However they are not sufficiently significant to effect this level of explanation.

We refer to the advanced reactions which use oxygen as "aerobic" and the primitive reactions which do not use oxygen, as "anaerobic".

When cells are working they are using a certain amount of energy. That energy is produced as a result of chemical reactions in the respiratory system at all the steps of the aerobic portion of the ladder at the same time. These reactions can be thought of as a system in that they are all related to each other. As energy is being used in a normal cell, the respiratory system is not only providing the energy used, but also replacing the energy held in reserve.

One might think of the chemical reactions like the electrical system in an automobile. The battery provides the spark to run the engine. The engine provides the power to drive the generator. The generator recharges the battery so it in turn can continue to provide the spark to the engine. If all works well, and the system is in balance the battery will have power to supply the engine for a very long time. Likewise in the cell, if all works well, the respiratory system is in balance. As energy is drawn off by work, the cell will generate new energy so that more is available. The balance insures a constant supply of energy is available for work.

In an automobile engine a serious problem can develop, if there is a long term, extraordinary drain on the power. For example, if a short develops or some one leaves the head lights on without the engine running (which would normally run the generator and resupply the battery). In these situations, there is a drain of energy and eventually the system will fail. Usually this means that the battery goes dead.

In the cell there can also be a long term, extraordinary drain of power. If this were a short term drain of energy, the cell could easily recover. For example, a muscle cell may get tired if you try to hold a weight over your head for a long time. If you put the weight down the cell will recover nicely. If the extraordinary work load on the cell continues, despite it's tired, respiration will continue, but the balance of the respiration system will eventually be affected. The unending continuation of such a work load is called a chronic situation. The individual cell has no way of shutting itself down to rest. It still keeps working, but the point of balance ~ will continually be at an ever lower oxidation reduction level, as long as the excess work load continues.

One example of a chronic condition is cigarette smoking. Cigarette smoke in the lungs is an irritant which the cells in the lungs are constantly working to overcome. As they continue to try to keep up the extra work caused by the smoke, the delicate balance of the respiratory system to the lung cells is altered and effectively moves continually lower on the respiratory ladder.

THE CRITICAL POINT

The cell's movement down the ladder slowly continues until it hits what might be called a critical point. the critical point is when the cell is about 85% of the way down from the top of the ladder. (Obviously, it is likewise about 15%. up from the bottom). the reason this is a critical point is that, for some reason, the cell does not fall any further down the ladder, and remains "in balance."

This "critical point" is significant for three other reasons. First, this is the lowest the cell can go on the respiratory ladder and still have significant similarities to a normal cell. however, it's also on one of the highest steps of the ladder it could be on and still be able to be in the primitive zone. Second, just as the cell had been "in balance" when it was working normally in the aerobic part of the respiratory ladder this is the point at which the cell reaches a new point of balance. It likes it there, it is and will never move back to its old, normal balance in the respiratory system. third, this is the stage at which the cell is now a cancer.

WHAT TO DO

Once the cell is at this critical, cancerous point, the question becomes: what to do about it? The first thought is to simply push the cell back up the ladder, much as one would recharge a nearly dead battery. In theory this should work as a cure for cancer. however, all efforts to date have failed. The chemicals thus far used to push the cells back up the respiratory ladder are very toxic. Therefore, those who have tried this method have caused almost as many problems in side effects as they have solved. It has not been a satisfactory solution. The second thought might be to remove the bad cells, much as one removes broken parts from a machine. In the context of cancer 'this is a polite way of saying we are going to kill the bad cells.

Currently, the three methods we used to kill cancer cells have severe drawbacks. Chemotherapy (i.e. chemical1s that kill cells) is not only toxic to cancerous cells, it is also toxic to healthy cells. Thus, it causes the extreme side effects with which we are all familiar, indeed, chemotherapy is so toxic to the healthy cells it could kill you if it were not for the cancer doing the job first. Radiation such as x rays that kill the cells has much the same drawbacks as chemotherapy. An x ray does not know the difference between healthy and sick tissue and can cause very undesirable side effects. Surgery (killing the cells by cutting them out) can never guarantee complete removal. Indeed, on occasion, surgery will end up speeding the spread of the cancerous cells to other parts of the body.

Entelev/Cancell takes a fourth approach. It was designed to take advantage of the fact that the cancer cell sits on the critical point of the ladder. Once again this critical point is where a cell turns cancerous, and is right on the boundary, the dividing line between primitive cells and normal cells. Normal cells, sometimes called differentiated cells, are cells which have all their functions and can do all their normal work, such as grow and divide or, for a muscle cell, contract. Healthy cells are at a steady state. they are constantly working, with much of their activity using energy. But, they are also effectively recharging themselves all the time. Thus, if you measured the potential of a normal cell (like measuring the potential of car battery with a properly functioning regulator) it would remain substantially constant unfortunately, as mentioned earlier, cancer cells are also at a steady state. Once pushed down to that critical point, the cell wants to stay in that new steady state at the 15% point on the oxidation reduction ladder.

The real problem with having a cell in the steady state at the critical point is that the body does not know how to deal with it. If the cell were still healthy, it would know how to recharge itself. If the cell were further down the oxidation reduction ladder the body would know how to get rid of it through natural processes.

Somewhat like jumping a fence, you are fine if you stay on your side and you are fine if you make it all the way over the fence. But, you are in real trouble if you land so you are straddling the fence. The cancer cell straddles the fence. It is neither normal enough to function correctly nor primitive enough for the body to deal with in an adequate fashion.

CANCELL THEORY OF OPERATION

The theory behind Entelev/Cancell is to push the cell further down the oxidation reduction ladder so it is fully and completely into the primitive stage of the oxidation reduction system. Here, the body can deal with the cancer cell on it's own. Cancer cells are often referred to as primitive cells. They are indeed primitive because oxygen is not used in the respiratory system of the cancer cell. Again, however, while they are true primitive cells in that sense, they constitute the boundary line between primitive and normal. It would take a relatively small step up the ladder for them to be normal again or a relatively small step down the ladder to be completely primitive so that the body could deal with them as primitive cells. Thus, even though they are primitive cells they look normal and act normal in certain respects.

Entelev/Cancell tries to take away the last vestiges of normality, pushing them down the oxidation reduction ladder so they are no longer on the boundary line. Once the cancer cell is definitely into the primitive stage, the body deals with it as the body does any other foreign object. It gets rid of it. but how?

A primitive cell is different than a normal cell in the way it functions. It can not exist like other cells in the body. It becomes alien tissue, as it were incompatible non functioning in the normal sense. It ceases to be cancer and it ceases to be normal. The body can not tolerate it and rejects it. much like trying to graft a piece of wood on your finger the body will not allow it. The primitive cells are attacked by the body in different ways. Depending on where they are in the body. In some places (like the brain) the body will form a crust like membrane around the primitive cells. There will be the tumor but it is dead and enclosed. in other places (skin cancer) the body will effectively digest it in a process called lysis or simply slough it off like a dried out scab.

HOW DOES ENTELEV/CANCELL WORK

The next question is: how does entelev/cancell cause the cell to shift from it's stable state at the critical point deeper into the primitive state? the process of moving down the oxidation reduction ladder is the process of chemical reduction, which is the opposite of oxidation, the moving up on the ladder.

There are chemicals that inhibit respiration. One example is a group of chemicals called catechols. catechols are common in nature. In fact the chemical that makes cranberries red is catechol. The inhibition of the respiration of a cancer cell will push it off it's stable state and completely into the primitive state. obviously, if a chemical is taken into the body which inhibits the respiration of the cancer cell it will likewise, inhibit the respiration ability of every other cell it acts on just as the sugar molecules from a candy bar will affect every cell they contact. Normal cells, it will be recalled, are working well within their potential to do work. they are working near the top of the oxidation reduction ladder, because the cell works most effectively there.

Since normal cells work at such a high level of the oxidation reduction system, if their respiration potential is reduced somewhat, it is no real problem for them. Cancer cells however, are at that critical point, right on the dividing line between normal and primitive. If their respiration ability is reduced, they will be pushed completely into the primitive state. The inibition of the respiratory system is done by shutting off energy units of the cell as it is working, so the energy is not going through the respiratory system. (An energy unit is two electrons and a proton). Thus, work is being done, by the cell, but not respiration. But, again, respiration is the process by which the cell manufacturers and delivers energy to the various parts of the cell so that the cell can function. If work is being done, but not respiration, the cell is forced further down the oxidation reduction ladder. Thus, once respiration is reduced the cell is forced down completely into the primitive state.

One of the chemicals which reduces respiration is catechol. The natural catechols have many different oxidation reduction potentials. For example, the level on the oxidation reduction ladder where the particular castechol will work or operate. The trick is to find one that works at the same level as a cancer cell, at that critical level.

Entelev/Cancel was developed to act like catechol - to inhibit respiration at the critical point. Entelev/Cancell’s entire chemical structure was designed to inhibit respiration of cells at the critical point, i.e. cancerous cells, and thus force cancer cells further into the primitive stage where the body will attack and dispose of them naturally.

Typical Questions Asked about Entelev/Cancell

1) What cancers does Entelev/Cancel affect?

2) What are the side effects of Entelev/Cancell ?

3) If Entelev/Cancell is so good, why isn’t it licensed by the FDA?

4) Is any special diet necessary while taking Entelev/Cancell ?

5) How much time is required on Entelev/Cancell before results can be expected ?

6) How does Entelev/Cancell interact with standard therapies like surgery, chemotherapy and radiation?

7) What if the doctor wants the patient to go back on chemotherapy after the Entelev/Cancell seems to be working ?

8) Entelev/Cancell seems to be embraced by mystics, astrologists, people espousing certain extreme diets and others who have all the signs of being quacks and fanatics. is the developer of Entelev/Cancell a member of any of these groups ?

Answers

1) What cancers does Entelev/Cancel affect?

Generally. Entelev/Cancell works on all forms of cancers. Very good reports have been received regarding brain, breast and lung tumors as well as non-Hodgkin’s lympomas.

The success rate for Entelev/Cancell is not perfect. It depends on the type of cancer being treated. It Generally runs at about 50% to 80%. For many forms of cancer, Entelev/Cancell’s success rate is far superior to any type of therapy now available.

One notable exception is leukemia, especially when the patient is a child. For this type, poor results have been reported. This is consistent with the NCI in vitro screening. The reason for this failure rate, especially among children is unclear. The general problem with leukemia may relate to the nature of the disease itself. With children, the problems may be associated with the metabolism that they have, the work load associated with their growth patterns.

2) What are the side effects of Entelev/Cancell ?

Entelev/Cancell has been used by over 5,000 human beings. There have also been experiments involving in excess of 20,000 mice ( mostly white mice or standard laboratory mice along with a few nude mice. Nude mice derive their name from the fact that they have no hair. Their significance is they have almost no immune system and are therefore, extremely vulnerable to toxic foreign substance ). Some of the mouse work has been specifically aimed at determining toxicity levels. No significant toxic side effects of Entelev/Cancell have been found to date. Keep in mind that almost all substances are toxic at extreme levels. When taken at normal doses, Entelev/Cancell appears to be less toxic than an occasional aspirin. The only adverse reaction reported to date involved a person who totally misunderstood the instructions and drank an entire pint of Entelev/Cancell concentrate ( i.e. about a three month supply ) in one dose resulting in a bad case of diarrhea for several hours. The individual reported being fine the next day.

3) If Entelev/Cancell is so good, why isn’t it licensed by the FDA?

There are a number of reasons which are easily identified. Objectively the primary problem is that the cost of bringing a new drug to the market is staggering. Without the backing of a drug company or an individual with significant resources there is no real chance for the average individual to meet all the requirements of the F.D.A.

Moreover, Entelev/Cancell has in the past, always been offered free not only to any person who wishes to take it but also to any company wishing to manufacture and distribute it. The information on how to make it and the theory behind it has also been made available to any serious, potential manufacturer. And there lies the rub. Since Entelev/Cancell has been given away freely to any interested drug company, drug companies cannot get a corner on the market and make substantial profits. Thus, the usual motivation for producing a new drug is not present.

Subjectively, there are a series of other reasons. Experts in the field of psychology have long noted that one of the great myths of life is the notion that change is a rational process. Unfortunately, getting people to change, even in the face of overwhelming facts, is not an easy process. Consider:

The number of medical doctors who continue to smoke although they should know better

The number of engineers and insurance people who should know better who continue to fight wearing seat belts.

On this subjective level, Entelev/Cancell violates a number of rules.

The number of medical doctors who continue to smoke although they should know better

The number of engineers and insurance people who should know better who continue to fight wearing seat belts. On this subjective level, Entelev/Cancell violates a number of rules:

FIRST, Everyone "knows" that only scientists with PH.Ds in their field ( Medicine , Chemistry, Biology, etc. ) can develop new drugs. Entelev/Cancell was developed by a person with "only" a Bachelors degree in Chemistry and the course work equivalent of a Masters degree. The all important label of PH.D. is missing.

SECOND, Everyone "knows" that if "it" ( whatever "it" happens to be ) is "not invented here" ( wherever "here" happens to be ), "it" cannot be very good. While this statement is patently absurd, it remains a real part of the thinking of many people. Scientists are not the perfectly objective, perfectly analytical, perfectly rational people that the media likes to portray. They are human beings with the same emotions and egos as everyone else. If it "Wasn’t invented here" it is just as suspect in the scientific community as anywhere else. Unfortunately, part of the "not invented here" syndrome in science also involves the question of self-preservation associated with grants and publications. To survive economically, many scientists must develop their own ideas for grant requests and writings in professional journals. An idea from someone else who does not have the "right" credentials hardly helps.

The above does not imply that the scientific world rejects Entelev/Cancell in bad faith or that it is guilty of some grand conspiracy. On the contrary, the vast majority of those in the scientific profession, whether in the private sector or the government, sincerely want to have a cure for cancer developed. They and their loved ones die of cancer at the same rate as the rest of the population. The problem is not their sincerity, it is their objectivity, and their objectivity has been seriously clouded.

Every method of treating cancer now is based on the assumption that cancer has to be killed. The idea that the body can be helped to dispose of it naturally is a wildly radical departure from what "Everyone Knows". There is an old saying to the effect that: To challenge the unknown requires courage, but to challenge the known requires greater courage yet, plus a good measure of audacity. Entelev/Cancell challenges all the known rules about the treatment of cancer. For any doctor or research to accept the theory of Entelev/Cancell would require him also to acknowledge he has been wrong in the past. That is the tough pill for anyone to swallow.

Moreover, while the theoretical basis for how Entelev/Cancell works can be explained in the relatively simple terms set forth above, the technical explanation is not easy to understand. It involves a cross between different disciplines in science. Thus while one expert may accept part of the theory, he or she may not have the background to understand the rest, and another who can understand the rest, might not be able to handle the first part. Despite this communication problem, the technical write up is available upon request.

4) Is any special diet necessary while taking Entelev/Cancell ?

No special diet is required. If one were to think in terms of the kind of diet your grandmother would recommend or the diet the Federal Government suggests, you have a fine base for taking Entelev/Cancell. In other words the diet should include foods from all basic food groups, including vegetables, fruits, breads, and meats. A balanced diet requires animal protein, which differs in it’s chemical make up from the protein in plants. This can be in the form of fish, fowl or red meat or such by-products as milk, cheese, or eggs.

However, do not take mega doses of vitamins C and E while taking Entelev/Cancell. The chemical make up of these two vitamins shifts the point on the Oxidation-Reduction ladder where Entelev/Cancell works. Since Entelev/Cancell was designed to hit hardest at the "CRITICAL POINT", i.e. Cancer cells, any shift will reduce the effectiveness of Entelev/Cancell.

This does not mean to completely cut out vitamins C and E. The amounts of vitamins C and E contained in the standard multivitamin, which can be purchased at any drug store are fine. Likewise the C and E which exist in a traditional "well-rounded diet" ( such as Vitamin C in orange juice ) will not adversely affect Entelev/Cancell, It is only the extraordinary doses of C and E which must not be taken.

5) How much time is required on Entelev/Cancell before results can be expected ?

The length of time required before seeing results varies greatly from one patient to another. Such factors as the type of cancer, how far the cancer has progressed, the age of the patient, and the patient’s general health ( other than the cancer ) can all play a role in determining the speed with which Entelev/Cancell operates.

Many people report noticeable results in 3 to 5 weeks. In about 9 weeks most people see results. However, some cases have taken up to months. This may seem awfully slow. However, it must be kept in mind that Entelev/Cancell is effectively "asking" the body to "cure itself". Entelev/Cancell does not actually "kill" the cancer cell in the usual meaning of the word "kill". Instead, it alters the cell in a way that the body can dispose of the cancer through such normal means as lysis. It should be noted that the process of altering the cancer cells and having the body dispose of them naturally is time consuming.

6) How does Entelev/Cancell interact with standard therapies like surgery, chemotherapy and radiation?

Chemotherapy can bring the percentage of success down because it changes the level of the Oxidation-Reduction ladder where Entelev/Cancell works. Since Entelev/Cancell was designed to hit a particular target, i.e., the "critical point" where cancer is located, any change will decrease its effectiveness. Furthermore chemotherapy as it has already been pointed out, is extremely toxic. This creates problems for the healthy cells in the body and becomes one more difficulty for the body to overcome.

Radiation has not produced the marked drop in percentage of success that Chemotherapy causes. While no explanation for this is apparent, it seems that radiation does not have quite the same effect on how Entelev/Cancell acts on the Oxidation-Reduction ladder as does Chemotherapy.

Surgery appears to have no real adverse effect on the ability of Entelev/Cancell to work on cancerous cells. The only major problem with surgery is that any time the body suffers a major wound, it is asked to perform a substantial amount of work to recover.

Having said all these, it is imperative to keep one thought firmly in mind ! Entelev/Cancell takes time to work ! AS noted above, 7 to 9 weeks is typical and some cases take up to 3 months or more to see a response. If a patient has only a few days or weeks to live, Entelev/Cancell may not have time to be effective. In such cases, the objective is to buy time. If Chemotherapy will give the patient an extra month or two, by all means it should be taken. These precious weeks can then be used to give Entelev/Cancell a chance to work.

Granted the use of Chemotherapy may reduce the effectiveness of Entelev/Cancell, but it is far better to reduce it’s effectiveness than suffer certain death !

7) What if the doctor wants the patient to go back on chemotherapy after the Entelev/Cancell seems to be working ?

There is a tendency on the part of Physicians to want to press the patient who is doing well on Entelev/Cancell to take Chemotherapy again to "Kill off the last vestiges of the Cancer". This decision belongs to the patient. One question should be asked about Chemotherapy however :

"Should a material, known to be toxic, be taken into the body unless extreme emergency conditions are faced ?"

As mentioned above, Chemotherapy has a use where there is no time left for a non-toxic material to work.

8) Entelev/Cancell seems to be embraced by mystics, astrologists, people espousing certain extreme diets and others who have all the signs of being quacks and fanatics. is the developer of Entelev/Cancell a member of any of these groups ?

The answer to this question is simple : NO! ABSOLUTELY NOT NEVER WAS, NEVER WILL BE! Mr. Sheridan does not agree with them and has never sought their support.

Mr. Sheridan does not challenge the sincerity of their beliefs and he will answer their questions as he would those of any one else. However, such courtesy should never be confused with agreement with their beliefs.

A short history of the project might explain the problem. James V. Sheridan graduated from High School at age 17 after completing two years of Junior High in just one year. In his Senior year, he won a State Senatorial Scholarship and chose to attend Carnegie Tech in Pittsburgh ( Now Carnegie Mellon ). He spent 5 years at Carnegie Tech, Four in Undergraduate work and one as a Graduate student. During his Graduate years, he was also a member of the teaching staff. In addition, he attended one summer school at Carnegie Tech and one at the University of Pittsburgh. By the end of his graduate year he had taken every advanced course in Chemistry, Physics and Math taught at Carnegie Tech.

Mr. Sheridan has spent two years working in the Analytical Lab at Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Michigan ( 1935-1937), three years a the Detroit Institute of Cancer Research ( now the Michigan Cancer Foundation) ( 1950-1953 ), and two years at Batelle Institute in Columbus, Ohio ( 1961-1963 ). In addition, he has had a lab in his home to run mouse experiments for a substantial number of years.

James V. Sheridan is a Christian. He believes that the basic idea of Entelev/Cancell is a gift from God, just as athletic talent, musical ability and all other gifts are blessings from God. He also believes in the power of prayer as described in the Bible and that the inspiration for Entelev/Cancell came as result of prayer ( indeed his original word for the material , ENTELEV, comes from the Greek word, "ENTELECHY" which means that part of man known only to God. The "EV" at the end of the word, ENTELEV refers to "ELECTROVALENCE", which is a reference to the Debye Theory upon which much of the development of Entelev/Cancell is bases ). Faith in God, an acceptance of Christ and a belief in the power of prayer ( which most traditional Americans subscribe to ) is a far cry from concluding that Entelev/Cancell is the result of some "MYSTICAL " experience or a certain configuration of planets on a certain day.

The inspiration for Entelev/Cancell came from prayer, but Thomas Edison once observed : "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration." The hard reality is that countless hours have been spent running thousands of mouse experiments through the years, along with additional thousands of hours spent in library research, testing of materials and record keeping, all these in accordance with generally accepted scientific theory and practice. Taking every advanced Chemistry, Physics and Math course at a nationally known college is not a "MYSTICAL" experience. Neither is running thousands of experiments and spending over 50 years working on a project an "Astrological" event. The good faith and sincerity of those wishing to embrace Entelev/Cancell because it "fits" with their own agenda is understandable. However, they simply do not understand the hard reality behind it’s development.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

James Vincent Sheridan is the developer and inventor of Entelev/Cancell. His technical background is set out in the body of this article. He provided all the technical information for the article.

James Edward Sheridan is the son of James Vincent Sheridan . He is a lawyer by training and has served as a District Court Judge in Michigan since 1979. James Edward Sheridan has no scientific training beyond a few undergraduate survey courses. James Edward Sheridan acted as the "layman" to ensure that the article could indeed be understood by a non-professional reader.